Talk:Richard Bridgeman, 7th Earl of Bradford

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

[edit] External links

The both webpages [www.faketitles.info] and [1] use an aggressiv and slanderous tone and seem to lead a smear campaign against the earl. They therefore contradict Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, so please don't add them again. ~~ Phoe talk 14:53, 5 February 2007 (UTC) ~~

GHOST RIDER 1000= Yes ok....but why do you permit that this same man does exactly what you forbidden ? In using the link www.faketitles.com. He does the same thing and you promote that !!!

If you had read my two links, you would know what the difference is, I think. I quote from Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons:
Unsourced or poorly sourced controversial (negative, positive, or just highly questionable) material about living persons should be removed immediately from Wikipedia articles, talk pages, and user pages.[2] These principles also apply to biographical material about living persons in other articles. The responsibility for justifying controversial claims in Wikipedia, of all kinds, but especially for living people's bios, rests firmly on the shoulders of the person making the claim.
www.faketitles.com is his own webpage and I don't believe that he would attack himself, offend himself or tell lies over himself. ~~ Phoe talk 15:25, 6 February 2007 (UTC) ~~

[edit] Related vandalism

Someone who seems to be affiliated with either Bridgeman's site, or the site of one of his detractors, has been launching an attack on the Knights Templar articles. I think we've got things under control, and the primary user Lordknowle (talk ยท contribs) has been blocked. However, if anyone who's been dealing with vandalism on Bridgeman's article, might be able to shed light on the Templar vandalism, I would much appreciate any advice. Thanks, Elonka 02:03, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

If anyone wishes to participate, there is currently an ANI thread on this article. --Elonka 23:54, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Protection

Down to sprot, expires in 2 weeks, please let me know if the problem resurfaces. Guy (Help!) 08:03, 29 March 2007 (UTC)