Talk:Rich Whitney
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Membership in the Socialist Labor Party
Is there a real statement somewhere that he "rejected" socialism in 1993? The commentary I have seen said he left the party becuase of a personal dispute, and now longer believes in socialism.
- I just reworded this to hopefully make it more accurate. His resignation letter from 1993 which I added as a reference doesn't claim any rejection (quite the contrary actually), but later newspaper articles say he now rejects it. Apparently the rejection occurred at some unknown time between then and now.--Fulara 15:27, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- This is explained in a Chicago Tribune article, published on November 6th, 2006:
Squideshi 15:40, 14 November 2006 (UTC)Whitney, who was the elected editor of the group's journal from 1989 to 1993, said he grew to disagree with many of its ideas, including those critical of capitalism. "That's something I left behind 14 years ago," Whitney said Sunday. "I'm not a socialist."
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Richw.jpg
Image:Richw.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

