Talk:Rich Fields

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ohio Portal
Rich Fields is part of WikiProject Ohio, which collaborates on Ohio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to current discussions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Please rate this article, and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
Suggested article edit guidelines:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Biography Portal
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.
WikiProject University of Florida This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Florida. If you would like to help, you can edit this article or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. Start
This article has been rated as a Mid priority article Mid
To-do list for Rich Fields: edit · history · watch · refresh

Here are some tasks you can do:

    [edit] Interview

    This is your last warning Authority. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Rich_Fields, you will be blocked from editing.


    User, Authority seems to have a problem with the interview that was recently added, do you really need to keep screwing around with the links? We proved to you that it fits the guidelines of wikipedia as it clearly states on the Wikipedia:External_Links page that links to interviews and rich media ARE acceptable. Please stop acting like a little child and stop editing the page to how you like it. Secretly editing the link so that it faults is completely unacceptable, especially for a thirty-year old gameshow worker such as yourself. I would think you would like to promote interviews of your fellow co-workers, but I guess not. Motoipod 00:59, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

    [edit] New article

    It looks like Rich Fields/Temp was also a copyvio. I've written a short, original article at Rich Fields/Temp/Temp. --Iowahwyman 01:45, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)

    [edit] Criticism

    This is not violating the NPOV policy. Please do not revert it or delete it. This article already is written "veteran broadcaster" Rich Fields.

    And directly from the NPOV article: "The notion of "unbiased writing" that informs Wikipedia's policy is "presenting conflicting views without asserting them"."

    NPOV violations :

    "and had a long career as a succesful"

    "Fields is a well-known voice-over talent and has done hundreds"


    So just because I list some critiscms allows some of these statements to fly, apparently.

    --CFIF 11:52, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

    March 2006 - The constant editing of "critiscms" by user CFIF on the front page seems to be nothing more than a personal and negatively biased opinon of the user. It has no place in a "factual" Encyclopedia type forum like Wikipedia. USER: BIZZREP

    Well, you can take this up with higher authority here if you really want to get it removed. --CFIF (talk to me) 20:17, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

    Good Idea. Thanks for the advice.--User:BIZZREP 10:29, 3 April 2006

    Will you stop removing it until we can get a decision on this? --CFIF (talk to me) 19:16, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

    • Your criticisms section is completely unsourced and uses many Weasel words. Please look at Verifiability, find some sources for your criticisms, and if you can't find any sources then the criticisms will have to stay out, per Wikipedia policy. Mak (talk) 21:44, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
    • The criticism is unsourced, unless you can find a reputable source that states the same, the criticism has to go. Eivindt@c 07:11, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

    Again I have had to edit back in "factual" info that is being removed by user CFIF on this site. The changes I made are verifiable facts regarding Rich Fields, as well the deletion of false information on the High Five Challenge. Please make sure you know your facts before removing or adding info to this site. If you persist in your attempts to defame this site, I will wage a complaint against you as a biased user to the authority here. ---User:Bizzrep 9:30, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

    How is getting rid of POV words like "successful" and "long" getting rid of "factual info." Rich Fields' website is not a verifiable source of info. It's all self promotional. --CFIF (talk to me) 11:06, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

    • Having a proven "26 year run" in both television and radio broadcasting certainly does constitute the use of the words "long career", as well as becoming the announcer on the number one rated television game show, should constitute the use of the word "successful", by anyone's POV!!!! How can you discount the fact that he has made a "success" in his chosen career, just because you have a personal bias against Mr. Fields. AGAIN I STATE.. this is a factual information site, please treat it as so, and keep your personal opinions out!

    ---User:Bizzrep 11:08, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

    It's still POV, and who are you (a newbie) to tell me "I'm defaming the site". --CFIF (talk to me) 19:30, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

    -- Your aggression towards me is unnecessary. What does the fact that I am new, have to do with the facts? Perhaps it is "you" who needs to re-read the POV for this site. (general POV)Since its already been decided once that your personal and "biased" criticisms be removed, I suppose I need another 3rd party opinion. Bizzrep 06:50, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

    Actually, Rod Roddy began announcing TPIR in 1986, not 1985. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.228.70.72 (talk) 23:38, 31 January 2008 (UTC)