Talk:Rhapsody: A Musical Adventure

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Famicom style controller This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article is on a subject of low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0.
VG To-do:

Contents

[edit] European release

Was this game released in Europe? --Mika1h 11:34, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Gamefaqs is your friend, and I don't believe that it was. Cabij 02:06, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Other Games

If anyone has played Little Princess: Maru Oukoku no Ningyou Hime 2 or Tenshi no Present - Marl Oukoku Monogatari, Id appreciate if they started pages on said games. Thanks! Evaunit666 02:10, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

I own both of them, plus the other three games. I'll help out as much as I can, but please stop removing the Rhapsody Afar link. It's a huge site with lots of infor on all of the Marl Kingdom games and even related games like Disgaea, La Pucelle, and Phantom Brave.TomitakePrincess 23:45, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

dont get me wrong, its a great site, but it still is a fan site. im not sure of the exact rules right now, so i wont get rid of them now. but posting a link to a fansite (yours?) can be considered advertisement and thus unfit for wikipedia. i certainly encourage you to use your vast knowledge to better the wikipedia articles, though. Evaunit666 00:32, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

When it comes to fansites, it seems a lot of Wikipedians will pull out every rule they can to keep them off, which is not hard, given how many rules this place has. The rule is that you can't post a site that is meant to advertise something, which that site does not. But there are many people who will delete it and revert to whatever excuse they can. Last time I added a site, they went from against the guidelines, to not notable, to copyright infringement. When I pointed out that post of their articles violated technically violate copyright by all the ridiculous things they pointed out, they banned me.@_@TomitakePrincess 06:18, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Wel, no they didn't. You're still posting, aren't you? - Alison ☺ 07:14, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

I had to get the ban unblocked. And even after the request was granted another admin prevented me from editting my talk page and blocked my IP. I hate that kind of low behaviour. Anyway, are we all agreed on keeping the link?TomitakePrincess 18:16, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

its been decided to not have the link. it is considered vandalism. Evaunit666 01:12, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Unfortunately, that editor went on to be blocked for a number of issues, including linkspamming. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#TomitakePrincess.C2.A0.28talk.C2.A0.C2.B7_contribs.29_-_again - Alison ☺ 01:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Come on people, what the matter? Let her have her website linked, it's a small thing and you make a fuss about it. --HanzoHattori 06:50, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

im sorry, but wow xD i was unaware that so much drama could happen on a few small wikipedia articles. theres a few rules on wikipedia i dont like, but i have to uphold the no fansite thing one. and sorry to anyone that misunderstood what i had previously said; i wasnt giving permission to have the links. Evaunit666 01:14, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

I think you can always close you eyes and not notice. I don't think this was a reason to make anyone feel bad or angry. Look, what kind of game is this one. It's cheerful. This affair is quite sad. --HanzoHattori 23:57, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

youre right about this being a sad affair, but it certainly didnt have to be. if it was up to me, i wouldnt have blocked her despite her putting words in my mouth and going against the rules, but other people felt she needed to get blocked. its kind of disappointing because she seemed to know a lot about the series and couldve helped the articles a lot O.o Evaunit666 01:21, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image

Does anyone know why the image is going to be deleted? I checked and there wasn't a tag saying what it's for. I'll fix it if theres something wrong with it. Thanks! Evaunit666 04:39, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Rhapsodyjapanesecover.jpg

Image:Rhapsodyjapanesecover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:06, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Rhapsodytalkscene.png

Image:Rhapsodytalkscene.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 21:44, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Problem?

I saw the latest comment, and although i dont know what happened, im wondering if theres a problem or an edit war about to start. Anyone know? Evaunit♥666♥ 01:08, 12 March 2008 (UTC)