Talk:Rewilding

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Re Pleistocene Rewilding I think, given the amount of press and debate it is generating since the article in NATURE, that Pleistocene Rewilding should have a seperate entry. The two different definitions of "rewilding" here have little in common.

Contents 1 green anarchism and anarcho-primitivism, 2 Proposed Split 3 Split 4 there will probably never be real (secondary) sources for this.

[edit] green anarchism and anarcho-primitivism,

I'm concerned about the promenance given to green anarchism and anarcho-primitivism. Looking at the groups concerned with The Wildlands Network Advisory Group we have people from

• English Nature a Government agency
• Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality, Department of Knowledge, Holland.
• John Muir Trust a scotish charity

I don't think these would be happy with the term anarcho-primitivism. --Salix alba (talk) 17:51, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Proposed Split

This enry is really two separate articles. The pleistocene rewilding definition could be much more detailed. It looks like a split has been proposed before, are there any objections?--Margareta 16:21, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Split

I agree, these two topics should definitely be split, but I don't know how to do that. Can someone else take up this project? Martha p 23:45, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm gonna remove the paragraph about Pleistocene Rewilding, and add a "see also" link to it. Murderbike 07:33, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] there will probably never be real (secondary) sources for this.

Just saying.P4k (talk) 00:48, 11 January 2008 (UTC)