Talk:Reunion Tour
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
|
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|
 |
This article has been automatically rated as Stub-Class by WikiProject Albums because it uses a stub template.
|
[edit] Cover image
I work at a book/music store (in Calgary, Alberta), and we got our shipment of this album in today. The cover is completely different than what's pictured here. Anyone know what the story is here? - Ugliness Man 04:36, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- One of two things: either there was a last minute cover art change, or the Canadian and American releases have different cover art. Both are known to happen sometimes in the music industry. However, as of the evening of September 24, Epitaph, ANTI- and amazon.com are all still reflecting the cover art depicted here, and the band's own website has yet to be updated with any cover art at all for the new album. So I guess we won't know for sure which of those is the case until tomorrow. Bearcat 01:58, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
-
- Nevermind, my mistake. I closed the store tonight, and at the end of my shift I priced and displayed this album (as well as the new Stars release), and the cover is the same. The way that the CDs were placed in the box when I processed it as we recieved it, I was seeing the image on the back cover and thought it was the front. Sorry for any confusion. - Ugliness Man 08:13, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Oh well, the album sucks anyway. I was excited for this release. There is no standout track on the album, and all the tracks sound pretty much the same. Should have been titled Yawn Fest '07. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.53.78.141 (talk) 16:42, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Everybody has different taste. It's not Reconstruction Site, certainly, but I love it a lot. Bearcat 19:10, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Oh well, the album sucks anyway. I was excited for this release. There is no standout track on the album, and all the tracks sound pretty much the same. Should have been titled Yawn Fest '07. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.53.78.141 (talk) 16:42, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
-
