Res gestae

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Evidence
Part of the common law series
Types of evidence
Testimony · Documentary evidence
Physical evidence · Digital evidence
Exculpatory evidence · Scientific evidence
Demonstrative evidence · Real evidence
Eyewitness identification · DNA · Lies
Relevance
Burden of proof · Laying a foundation
Subsequent remedial measure
Character evidence · Habit evidence
Similar fact evidence
Authentication
Chain of custody
Judicial notice · Best evidence rule
Self-authenticating document
Ancient document
Witnesses
Competence · Privilege
Direct examination · Cross-examination
Impeachment · Recorded recollection
Expert witness · Dead man statute
Hearsay (and its exceptions)
Hearsay: in U.K. law · in U.S. law
Confessions · Business records
Excited utterance · Dying declaration
Party admission · Ancient document
Declarations against interest
Present sense impression · Res gestae
Learned treatise  · Implied assertion
Other areas of the common law
Contract law · Tort law · Property law
Wills and Trusts · Criminal law
This article is for the legal term 'Res Gestae'. For the article on the record of the accomplishments of the first Roman emperor, Augustus, see the article for Res Gestae Divi Augusti.

Res gestae (a Latin phrase meaning "things done") is a term found in substantive and procedural American jurisprudence and English Law


Contents

[edit] Res Gestae in Rules of Evidence

Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, Res Gestae is an exception to the rule against Hearsay evidence. Res gestae is based on the belief that because certain statements are made naturally, spontaneously and without deliberation during the course of an event, they leave little room for misunderstanding/misinterpretation upon hearing by someone else (i.e. by the witness who will later repeat the statement to the court) and thus the courts believe that such statements carry a high degree of credibility. Statements which can be admitted into evidence as Res gestae fall into three headings:

  1. Words or phrases which either form part of, or explain, a physical act,
  2. Exclamations which are so spontaneous as to belie concoction, and
  3. Statements which are evidence as to someone's state of mind.

(In some jurisdictions the Res gestae exception has also been used to admit police sketches.)[1]

The following scenario is an example of types one and two:

Imagine then a young woman standing on the side of a main road (the witness). She sees some commotion across the street. On the opposite side of the road to her she sees an old man shout 'The bank is being robbed!' as a young man runs out of a building and away down the street. The old man is never found (so can't appear in court and repeat what he said) but the woman repeats what she heard him say. Such a statement would be considered trustworthy for the purpose of admission as evidence because the statement was made concurrently with the event and there is little chance that the witness repeating the hearsay could have misunderstood its meaning or the speaker's intentions.

Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, Res Gestae may also be used to demonstrate that certain character evidence, otherwise excludable under the provisions of Rule 404, is permissible, as the events in question are part of the "ongoing narrative", or sequence of events which are necessary to define the action at hand.


[edit] Res Gestae in Criminal Law

In certain felony murder statutes, "Res Gestae" is a term defining the overall start-to-end sequence of the underlying felony. Generally, a felony's Res Gestae must be interrupted by a point in which the defendants have achieved a position of relative safety from law enforcement for the underlying felony to be considered terminated.

[edit] English Law

For a technical explaination of Res gestae under English law See: WikiCrimeLine Res gestae


[edit] Other Uses

Res gestae is also used to refer to those facts or things done which form the basis or gravamen for a legal action.


[edit] Links

For a graphical explanation See: [1]


[edit] Notes

  1. ^ Commonwealth v. Dugan, 381 A.2d 967 (Pa. Super. 1977)
Languages