Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/WNDL42

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Housekeeping Question

I signed under the "endorsing" category as someone who endorses the summary as given, and hadn't intended to add anything else to the RfC. But since then, in response to a comment I made on the "Bleep" talk page, user WNDL42 wrote a comment on my talk page that I would like to submit as evidence. I don't know if that makes me "involved" and if it means I should remove my signature from the "endorse" category and write a separate statement, as well as adding the comment to the evidence. I read the instructions at RfC/User conduct but I'm still not clear on how I should proceed at this point. Thanks. Woonpton (talk) 13:00, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

A RfC is a fairly informal proceeding aimed to gauge the scope and rational behind why we find the patterns of behaviors found in this case unhelpful. At this stage, discussing your opinions and experiences on the matter on this talk page is the most appropriate route. Jefffire (talk) 17:35, 29 February 2008 (UTC)