Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/DreamGuy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Related discussions

See WP:ANI/Archive110. --Elonka 22:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Comments moved from the 3 February 2008 request

I agree totally with the above comment. Dreamguy's incivility has clearly been demonstrated by several editors, but for some reason you do not/will not see it. Can another admin please look at this series of concerns, please. Jack1956 (talk) 20:38, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Okay, I think this has went far enough. Jack, will you please drop this matter? The Check has been declined by a Checkuser, and that's the end of the matter. If you have any further evidence supporting your argument, then by all means: provide it. However, you aren't going to gain any new ground with repetitive arguments. Please cease now. Anthøny 22:27, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

(ec)Declining a CheckUser for the same user over and over (and over and over) again is a rather significant hurdle to overcome when pleading impartiality. While my reticence to trust your judgment in this matter is clearly seen as an attack, you have only served to further cement my point by refusing to hand the matter off to another clerk, which would address that pesky, recurring suggestion of partiality. Actions speak louder than words. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 22:29, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

And with respect, Anthony, as an Eguor admin, you must realize that admins are human and occasionally make mistakes. We are contending that such an error has been made here. We weren't calling for D's head on a stick, but that another CheckUser without significant and repeated connection to this matter weigh in. Didn't seem like too much to ask. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 22:32, 7 February 2008 (UTC)