Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/Dineshkannambadi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comment:You didn't even look into this and are showing biasedness the same way. Not too long ago, you have confirmed that Sarvagnya/Gnanapiti are sockpuppets here and a couple of months later you let them off the hook here under the condition that both usernames are not used to edit the same article which they have notoriously have ever since. As a matter of fact, they have engaged in a several vote frauds too. I am taking this as favoritism and abuse of powers on your part Dmcdevit. Wiki Raja 03:54, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Furthermore, your group is now trolling my talk page here. Wiki Raja 04:19, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Comment:All restrictions on editing by Sarvagnya and Gnanapiti were removed as seen here. It is however surprising that Wiki Raja seems to have contributed significantly to that discussion and still did not know of the outcome. Well, I have to assume good faith, shouldn't I? -- ¿Amar៛^{Talk to me/My edits} 05:20, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

And the only administrator to actually look into this was obviously Blnguyen. This is the same admin who backs up users such as Sarvagnya/Gnanapiti, KNM, etc. Furthermore, this is the same admin who encourages these same users to engage in mass reverts of topic pages here. Wiki Raja 05:34, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

That decision was based on consensus and not a single handed act of Blnguyen. If you look at the discussion (or should I show you) that he waited for a considerable amount of time to see if there was any objection from anybody before going ahead. If you had concerns, you should have taken it up at that time. Other admin Aksi_great was also involved in the decision. Please do not pull wool over everyone's eyes. -- ¿Amar៛^{Talk to me/My edits} 05:37, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

We should really ignore these products of petulance.Bakaman 23:05, 14 September 2007 (UTC)