Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Raphael1/Proposed decision
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] I am disruptive?
(I've posted this to User_talk:Dmcdevit before, but found that it would fit here as well.)
- Please take a look at the diffs listed on Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive103#User:Raphael1_blocked_for_a_week. I truely can't see how any of those posts constitute a personal attack. Please tell me which diff attacks whom and why.
- The proposed findings of fact states that User:Raphael1/Consequences of enforcing results of polls in February has no encyclopedic value and I agree to that. But WP:USER does not suggest, that only encyclopedic material is allowed in user space:
- Another use is to let people know about your activities on Wikipedia, and your opinions about Wikipedia. So you might include current plans, a journal of recent activities on Wikipedia, and your (constructive) opinions on how certain Wikipedia articles or policies should be changed.
- Where could I've learned, that posting ideas of a indef-banned editor is a case of disruption? Is it a case of disruption too, when I post ideas of someone who never had a Wikipedia account?
Raphael1 18:09, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
