Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Rlevse 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Edit Count

User:Rlevse

      run at Tue Feb 20 01:21:12 2007 GMT

Category talk:  192
Category:       343
Help:   1
Image talk:     234
Image:  418
Mainspace       12739
Portal talk:    132
Portal: 713
Talk:   4434
Template talk:  66
Template:       183
User talk:      3322
User:   1190
Wikipedia talk: 533
Wikipedia:      2900
avg edits per article   3.74
earliest        19:25, 15 November 2005
number of unique articles       7334
total   27400
2005/11         258     
2005/12         1021    
2006/1  3160    
2006/2  1749    
2006/3  566     
2006/4  1033    
2006/5  1120    
2006/6  2170    
2006/7  4882    
2006/8  1726    
2006/9  1499    
2006/10         1622    
2006/11         1351    
2006/12         1645    
2007/1  2968    
2007/2  630

Source: http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/Tool1/wannabe_kate?username=Rlevse&site=en.wikipedia.org

[edit] Discussion moved from project page

Blnguyen replied to Albatross2147: Seeing as your sense of humour includes referring to people of mixed ethnic descent as mongrels (see block log), I feel that your judgment of the candidate as lacking in humour is unreliable. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 01:01, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

The following was moved from the project page. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-22 13:20Z
People in glasshouses shouldn't throw stones... as you well know bananabucket is a vulgar and sexist term in some countries but you persist in using it in your sig. In any event Wp it self does not define mongrel used in relation to a person as racist although you have chosen to regard it as such. Albatross2147 01:08, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
The cite that was given to me did not have bananabucket as an obscene anatomical term, and the only person to complain about this in the four months I've had this sig is an anon who said he was from RSA but whose IP happens to be in Turkey and had no other edits. The ~300 people who came past my arb vote page all saw it and nobody saw anything remotely questionable. Mongrel is perceived as derogatory by a large proportion of people and you chose used it while editing a biography the subject of which you obviously have negative opinions of. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 01:28, 22 February 2007 (UTC)