Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/PaxEquilibrium
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
PaxEquilibrium's edit stats using "wannabe Kate" tool as of 00:07, 14 May 2007 (UTC):
Category: 9
Image talk: 12
Image: 39
Mainspace 5046
Portal talk: 10
Portal: 42
Talk: 2318
Template talk: 49
Template: 202
User talk: 5236
User: 302
Wikipedia talk: 108
Wikipedia: 649
avg edits per page 5.22
earliest 16:49, 24 August 2005
number of unique pages 2686
total 14022
2005/8 66
2005/9 245
2005/10 320
2005/11 725
2005/12 891
2006/1 801
2006/2 455
2006/3 699
2006/4 1055
2006/5 651
2006/6 853
2006/7 119
2006/8 75
2006/9 802
2006/10 908
2006/11 998
2006/12 844
2007/1 645
2007/2 527
2007/3 808
2007/4 1148
2007/5 387
(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red denotes edits without an edit summary)
Mainspace
252 History of the demographics of Bosnia and Herzegovina
167 Duklja
97 National Assembly of Serbia
91 Stephen II of Bosnia
84 Kosovo
82 Lika
82 Ljudevit Posavski
79 Matej Ninoslav
71 Pagania
68 Serbian parliamentary election, 2007
66 Serbs of Croatia
61 Demographic history of Kosovo
58 Roger Joseph Boscovich
54 Petar II Petrović-Njegoš
53 Montenegrins
Talk:
113 Pagania
88 Sokollu Mehmet Paşa
82 Kosovo
75 Roger Joseph Boscovich
69 Kosovo/Archive 8
59 Kosovo/Archive 12
58 Serbs
57 Stephen II of Bosnia
52 Duklja
52 Kosovo/Archive 11
48 House of Petrović-Njegoš
41 History of the demographics of Bosnia and Herzegovina
40 History of Bosnia and Herzegovina
32 Ivo Andrić
32 Montenegrins
Category:
2 Kosovo
Image:
3 SrbiBalkan.gif
2 Srbi u Jugoslaviji.jpg
2 Arhpetar.jpg
2 Stefan Nemanja.jpg
2 Ston.jpg
2 Mihailo.jpg
Image talk:
2 000 Montenegrins.JPG
Portal:
14 Montenegro/Did you know
7 Montenegro/Intro
4 Bosnia and Herzegovina/Intro
3 Montenegro/Web resources
2 Montenegro/Featured article
2 Montenegro/Featured person
Portal talk:
3 Montenegro
2 Politics
2 Current events
Template:
40 Serbian parliamentary election, 2003
15 Serbian elections
13 Montenegrin parliamentary election, 2006
11 Serbian parliamentary election, 2007
11 User cg
8 Serbian political parties
7 Montenegrin elections
6 Assembly of Serbia and Montenegro
5 User cg-4
5 Infobox Kosovo
5 User cg-2
4 User cg-3
4 User bs
4 MontePres
4 User cg-1
Template talk:
14 Serbs
6 User cg-4
4 User cg
4 Serbian elections
3 Assembly of Serbia and Montenegro
3 Serbian parliamentary election, 2003
3 Infobox Kosovo
2 Montenegrins
2 User bs
2 In the news
User:
93 PaxEquilibrium
16 PaxEquilibrium/Poll
14 Luka Jačov
10 Nightstallion/notes
9 Chris 73/Archive 008
7 Getoar
6 194.152.217.129
5 PaxEquilibrium/Petition
5 Tar-Elenion
4 Praskaton
4 Linuxbeak/Wikimania 2006/Wikipedian Survey
4 Kubura
3 Ilir pz
3 Elephantus
3 Bormalagurski
User talk:
255 Nightstallion
176 PANONIAN
171 Joy
170 Ilir pz
129 Kubura
114 Emir Arven
108 CrnaGora
107 Afrika paprika
107 Jagoda 1
106 Dijxtra
102 Sideshow Bob
94 Dado
89 Kseferovic
89 Mir Harven
85 Marinko
Wikipedia:
45 Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
41 Requests for page protection
29 Requests for checkuser/Case/Afrika paprika
27 Requests for arbitration/Kosovo/Workshop
23 Administrators' noticeboard/3RR
21 In the news section on the Main Page/Candidates
20 Requests for adminship/HolyRomanEmperor 4
17 Requests for comment/Emir Arven
17 Personal attack intervention noticeboard
13 Article Creation and Improvement Drive
13 WikiProject Unrecognized countries
11 Requests for checkuser/Case/Kubura
11 Requests for adminship/HolyRomanEmperor3
10 Administrator intervention against vandalism
9 Changing username
Wikipedia talk:
11 WikiProject Belgrade
9 WikiProject Former Yugoslavia
9 List of Wikipedians by number of edits
5 WikiProject Serbia
5 Requests for checkuser/Case/Afrika paprika
5 WikiProject Military history/Balkan military history task force
5 Requests for arbitration/Kosovo
4 WikiProject Montenegro
4 WikiProject Kosovo
3 Administrator intervention against vandalism
3 WikiProject Fascism
3 WikiProject Croatia
3 WikiProject History
3 Notability
3 WikiProject Awards
[edit] Problem
Like I said in the comments already. If someone mentions me a single good reason why I should not be an administrator - he/she should do notify me in person of that and I will withdraw the request.
So far I've seen (aside from votestalking and allegations of my *insanity*) the only argument presented (although User:Alabamaboy has noted the edit summaries, however I do not see this enough as explained at his talk page) is the huge incident that happened over my death hoax around a year ago. I need only one b'crat to come to me and notify me that this is why I simply cannot be trusted admin tools (regardless of whether I'm just a victim or the culprit; I'll understand sensible arguments) - and I will pull this nomination. --PaxEquilibrium 07:56, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
- Bureaucrats judge consensus. There was clearly no consensus - and therefore we cannot promote. Secretlondon 20:36, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Votes
OK, so let's see:
- User:Zmaj, User:Ceha and possibly (although not surely) User:Ante Perkovic's votes seem to be invited (the first one for sure, probably the second too), while they (the first and the last) call upon my insanity in their (opposing) votes.
- User:Hipocrite has said that he will (or a bureaucrat, if he doesn't) move his vote to neutral after I assured him that I posses a strong password.
3Neutral votes have decided to sit and wait before they finally decide whether they support or oppose me.- 2, one has just determined for Support. --PaxEquilibrium 07:47, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
That seems to be it (although I really, really do not understand the explanation given at User:Thewanderer's vote, I don't get it). --PaxEquilibrium 07:37, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Another Errabee ...
Again a lot of canvassing against an editor who yes has got a POV (we all have), and yes does not keep out of nationalist POV pushing discussions and editing conflicts, and still keeps calm under difficult circumstances.
So much canvassing, in fact, that some habitual visitors of Requests for Adminship start looking for a reason to vote against. "Gee, this guy is controversial, let's find a stick to hit him with."
With Errabee it was his opinion on Commons that was the stick (never mind that nobody actually believed that he would use his adminship to keep copyright violations on Wikipedia), here it is PaxEquilibrium's lack of comment summaries that is used to thwart him (never mind that precisely because PaxEquilibrium keeps cool during tribal wars he writes a lot on talk pages and many people, like me, do not really think those edits need comment summaries).
It seems like people who get involved in such tribal war discussions have virtually no chance of ever becoming an admin now, though Wikipedia actually needs people who know what the ... it is all about. Never mind that PaxEquilibrium's block log is clean, that Errabee was supported by a Polish editor (not me) and that PaxEquilibrium has people from various quarters in the area who want him to be an admin. Too bad. Too bad. (I write that only twice, because if I wrote it thrice, some nut would find something hidden behind that as well).--Pan Gerwazy 18:08, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
