Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Matt Britt/Confusing

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

• As this section has been signifignatly edited and outmerged since creating, please comment in other sections. Historical information may be found in this history. — xaosflux ^Talk 02:05, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] This method of RFA is so confusing that I am unable to participate.

Editor's note: I have move this view from Matt Britt's RfA to here, as meta discussions regarding the format of the RfA are inappropriate for the RfA and are better directed here. --Durin 12:51, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

• I strongly disagree with Durin's summary. This was a list of users who were 'unable to participate' in the RFA due to the reformatting. I don't think that one should necessarily consider all of these as opposing editors, but it is a reasonable option.AKAF 15:28, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
• Please move this back. It is extremely significant that the view that this process is invalid has nearly as many endorsements as the most popular view of the candidate. The alternative for me would be to disendorse every single positive view of the candidate in that RFA. >Radiant< 14:24, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
• I agree - this should be moved back to the discussion. Metadata or not, it is significant. Kafziel ^Talk 18:00, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

• Moved back. It is very relevant to the RFA. >Radiant< 08:04, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.