Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Cobi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mainspace 282
Portal: 1
Talk: 22
User talk: 264
User: 380
Wikipedia talk: 6
Wikipedia: 108
avg edits per page 1.98
earliest 05:37, 30 June 2007
number of unique pages 538
total 1063
2007/6 3
2007/7 207
2007/8 356
2007/9 476
2007/10 21
Mainspace
5 ClueNet
4 Miley Cyrus
4 Shell account
2 Boy racer
2 Red skye comics
2 RuPaul
2 Denver Broncos
2 Glen Jacobs
2 Fornication
2 Eclogues
2 Dakota Fanning
Talk:
3 Shell account
User:
69 ClueBot/FalsePositives/IPReports
65 ClueBot/FalsePositives
26 Cobi/monobook.js
18 ClueBot Commons/Infobox
14 ClueBot/Documentation
13 ClueBot II/ClueBot Script
10 ClueBot II/tasks
8 ClueBot Commons/BotNav
8 ClueBot
7 SineBot/Sandbox
7 ClueBot/Warnings/Vandal4
7 ClueBot/Warnings/Vandal1
6 ClueBot Commons/Userpage
6 ClueBot/Whitelist
5 ClueBot/Warnings/Vandal2
User talk:
57 ClueBot Commons
46 Cobi
7 209.244.42.97
6 CO
4 JoshEdgar
4 76.195.10.32
3 Thedjatclubrock
3 24.4.253.249
3 Collin89
2 Jossi
2 Kamakawaka
2 66.65.208.142
2 72.27.46.96
2 Wknight94
2 68.188.157.82
Wikipedia:
19 Bots/Requests for approval/ClueBot
14 WikiProject on open proxies
10 Bots/Requests for approval/ClueBot 2
8 Bots/Requests for approval
7 Bots/Requests for approval/ClueBot II
6 Administrator intervention against vandalism
5 Bots/Requests for approval/ClueBot III
5 Sandbox
4 Bots/Requests for approval/ClueBot II 2
4 Bots/Requests for approval/ClueBot IV
3 Bots/Requests for approval/ClueBot V
2 Bots/Status
2 Requests for adminship/Wikihermit 2
Wikipedia talk:
3 Bots/Requests for approval
[edit] Anciliary comments
These comments are general, but important in that sense so I thought I'd leave them here. They couldn't be made due to the RfA being suspended.
- in response to [1]
- As I submitted above it's not missing the forest for the trees, to abuse your metaphor it's protecting the forest from being burned down. What it really does is align our standards with what's really important. And we wouldn't need such protection from vandals (at least it would become drastically less important) if we had a stable version system implemented properly. In the end it still all boils down to the only thing we are here for is to write an encyclopedia. Finally sneaky vandalism is much more costly, and that can only be properly combatted by someone that is working on the material of the article. - Taxman Talk 22:24, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
