Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Islam and antisemitism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


This Request for Mediation has been closed.

This case was closed at 23:39, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
The reason given for closure was: Parties unwilling to compromise / edit warring during mediation
Parties: If you wish to resume this mediation, please file a new request.

Contents

[edit] Islam and antisemitism

view edit delete watch
Filed: 04:27, August 24, 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Involved parties

[edit] Articles involved

[edit] Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted

[edit] Issues to be mediated

(Issues listed by the original, filing party)
  • What should be done with the section entitled "Judaism in Muslim theology"?
  • Should material regarding the relationship between antisemitism and tolerance shown to Jews be included?
  • Should material regarding the treatment of Jews by medieval Muslims (in relation to antisemitism) be included?
  • Should material regarding the history of Muslim antisemitism during modern times and its present status be included?
  • Should material regarding the future of antisemitism in the Muslim world be included?

[edit] Additional issues to be mediated

(Issues listed by other listed parties)
  • Should material that is irrelevant to the topic of antisemitism be included?
  • NPOV issues
  • Should opinions that create POV disputes be added to the lead?
  • What the actual issues are.

[edit] Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only "agree" or "disagree" and signatures should appear here; any comments will be removed.

  1. Agree.Bless sins 04:27, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
  2. Agree--SefringleTalk 05:55, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Parties' agreement to Deskana's offer

Deskana (talk • contribs • blocks • protects • deletions • moves • rights), an experienced administrator and bureaucrat, has expressed an offer to take this case during his application to join the Mediation Committee, to assist the Committee both with our backlog and to assess his nomination. However, as Deskana is not a member of the Committee at the present, it is a generally accepted practice that the parties must consent to a non-Committee member mediating a RfM.

As such, can I ask that all parties to the mediation please list whether they "agree" or "disagree" to Deskana mediating below, in much the same format as the initial agreement above. Voting will last seven days from today. On all accounts, I encourage you to take Deskana's offer, however the choice is, of course, yours.

For the Mediation Committee, Daniel 12:24, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
  1. Agree.Bless sins 12:41, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
  2. Agree. SefringleTalk 03:28, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Decision of the Mediation Committee

A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-mediators should not edit this section.

Accept.
For the Mediation Committee, Daniel 06:53, 24 August 2007 (UTC)