Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Ebionites
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Ebionites
|
This case was closed at 07:55, 21 September 2007 (UTC) |
[edit] Involved parties
- Ovadyah (talk · contribs)
- MichaelCPrice (talk · contribs)
- Str1977 (talk · contribs)
- Warlordjohncarter (talk · contribs)
[edit] Articles involved
[edit] Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted
- Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard#Ebionites.23Essenism
- Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Jewish_history#Further_improvements_to_the_Ebionites_article
- Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Religion_and_philosophy
- User_talk:Jayjg#We_could_use_some_help
- Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive287#Expert_attention_needed_on_Ebionites_featured_article
- Wikipedia:Featured_article_review/Ebionites
[edit] Issues to be mediated
- The party filing this request uses this section to list the issues for mediation. Other parties can list additional issues in the section below.
- Content that is based on editorial synthesis of source material
- Proper attribution of sources to support content
- The proper application of the criterion of undue weight
- Proper representation of "fringe theories" in the article
[edit] Additional issues to be mediated
- Other parties can use this section to list any others issues they wish to include in the mediation. Please do not modify or remove any other party's listing. Please sign all additions to this section if there is more than two parties involved in this case.
-
- I would like a bit more transparency here. Why were my issues removed? If everyone has agreed to assume good faith in the future, then where have they agreed this?--Michael C. Price talk 07:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Parties' agreement to mediate
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only "agree" or "disagree" and signatures should appear here; any comments will be removed. Comments can be made at the talk page.
- Agree. Ovadyah 23:20, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Agree. Str1977 (talk) 09:43, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Agree. John Carter 18:16, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Agree. Michael C. Price talk 19:35, 14 September 2007 (UTC)Disagree for reasons listed elsewhere. --Michael C. Price talk 07:49, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Decision of the Mediation Committee
- A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-Committee members should not edit this section.
- Note: Michael C. Price has informed me that he will be away from Wikipedia for the next week. The Committee will not make its decision on whether to accept or reject this case until he has returned to active editing.
- Accept.
- For the Mediation Committee, WjBscribe 22:45, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
- If no one objects, I'll take this case. -- tariqabjotu 17:43, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- Why would anyone object? John Carter 18:34, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- There is no particular reason I believe anyone will object to my offer. I am just making it known that any one of the parties can object to my mediating if he or she believes there's a problem. The mediation is starting and so anyone with such an objection is just supposed to interrupt and say so. -- tariqabjotu 20:22, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- No objection here. I'm glad to have you working with us. Ovadyah 12:30, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Why would anyone object? John Carter 18:34, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- If no one objects, I'll take this case. -- tariqabjotu 17:43, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- For the Mediation Committee, WjBscribe 22:45, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

