Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/User:204.153.84.10

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/User:204.153.84.10}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.


[edit] User:204.153.84.10

main edit links history watch
Filed: 22:04, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Renvarian has been identified as a sockpupet of Grawp. My user page was attacked by him moments after I reverted an edit by 204.153.84.10. I don't believe this is coincidental and that I suspect 204.153.84.10 and 207.229.140.148 are also sockpuppets of Grawp, as they are carrying out similar edits. Gavin Collins (talk) 22:04, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Clerk note: I'm not sure that Slakr (talk • contribs • blocks • protects • deletions • moves • rights) is a sockpuppet of grawp ;). 24.8.237.132 is blocked as a sock of grawp already, the 2 other IPs were not caught in autoblocks. -- lucasbfr talk 08:48, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
How dare you be so impertinent as to give an opinion, little clerk! ;-) Dmcdevit·t 09:07, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Er, Declined a check on Slakr; I assume that was a mistake. As for the others, whatever {{template}} goes here, I checked the grawppuppet because it's Grawp, but there were no sleepers on the IP. I can already tell you that the other IPs aren't related to his normal ranges. Dmcdevit·t 09:07, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Apologies, my mistake: I see that Slakr was reverting Renvarian. Slakr should not have been added to this request.--Gavin Collins (talk) 09:09, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.