Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ultramarine

[edit] Ultramarine

• Ultramarine (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• NuclearUmpf (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

• Code letter: F [1]

This user has sparked at least two edit wars through the posting of material in clear violation of WP:OR, WP:SYN, and WP:NPOV, adamantly refusing in every case any consensual re-working of the material posted to accord with wikipedia policy. Please see Propaganda Model and State Terrorism by the United States for recent activity, in each case leading to edit wars and page-protection.

I was told this was not "evidence" enough, so i'll point out: user follows same POV patterns in edits and choice of edits as NuclerUmpf; same grammatical, spelling and vocabulary usage; same rhetorical techniques; same confrontational style of posting; same mistakes. Stone put to sky 07:37, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Declined. Mackensen (talk) 11:58, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

On what basis is this declined? Stone put to sky 13:07, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

That is not enough reason to suspect socking, nor is there significant disruption. Voice-of-All 01:22, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Not significant disruption? Either you haven't looked at the pages in question, or you are playing favorites.

Further, Ultramarine is clearly the banned poster in question. Now, i'd be somewhat more satisfied if you said that you'd checked but he is either not the same poster or using a proxy; but you haven't done that. You have simply refused to run a simple checkuser, despite the fact that simple perusal of his posts will guarantee instant recognition. Stone put to sky 15:19, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Oh, well, in that case the answer is Unnecessary. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 16:15, 8 July 2007 (UTC)