Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Transitguru

[edit] transitgumbo

• transitgumbo (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• [[User:|]] ([[User talk:|talk]] • contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • block user • block log • checkip)
• [[User: | ]] ([[User talk: |talk]] • contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • .html RBLs • block user • block log • checkip)
• [[User:|]] ([[User talk:|talk]] • contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • block user • block log • checkip)
• [[User:|]] ([[User talk:|talk]] • contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • block user • block log • checkip)
• Code letter: F
• Supporting evidence: [1][2][3][4][5][6]

[7] Checkuser requested as advised at AN/I [8]. SpinningSpark 22:07, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Confirmed -to - preferably the former - Alison ^❤ 23:25, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Can you explain the softblock range to me, I don't understand. None of the guilty IPs are in that range. SpinningSpark 23:47, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Sure. A CIDR range of will extend all the way from up to . This is as tight a range that can be blocked yet cover the range of addresses used by the . The only one that's outside that range is the 66 one, which could be covered by another /24 rangeblock if needs be. See Classless Inter-Domain Routing - Alison ^❤ 23:53, 26 February 2008 (UTC)