Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Sbhushan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Sbhushan
| main edit links history watch Filed: 05:42, 7 August 2007 (UTC) |
- Sbhushan (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Watch844 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Code letter: E
On 4–5 August 2007, Watch844 committed 8RR within a period of approximately 30 hours.
- 1st revert: 10:49, 4 August 2007
- 2nd revert: 16:25, 4 August 2007
- 3rd revert: 16:56, 4 August 2007
- 4th revert: 17:17, 4 August 2007 (Your fear driven response is fantasy and has no place in science. Look at the genetic evidence properly, attempt to understand it, then respond.)
- 5th revert: 20:21, 4 August 2007 (There is very little that I have removed. I have removed only a few of the the deliberately misleading sentences that have been written and claim to cite a reference or which contradicts it.)
- 6th revert: 21:18, 4 August 2007 (The "much cited material" is a 20 year old incorrect quote. If you care to look, the new reference is for a recent update. Post on talk if you disagree with the opening reversion.)
- 7th revert: 15:08, 5 August 2007
- 8th revert: 19:18, 5 August 2007
Within mainspace, the edit histories of both Watch844 and Sbhushan concentrate on articles that deal with Indo-European origins, particularly with regard to India.
Sbhushan and Watch844 both have a penchant for speaking (incorrectly) on behalf of entire academic disciplines.
Sbhushan: Archeologists don’t care much for the linguistic constructs and are not as interested in solving this PIE homeland puzzle.
Watch844: Unlike yourself, geneticists try to retain an objective neutral viewpoint that is open to all possibilities. They do not try to fabricate a story based on their preconceived hopes/beliefs.
Also, both Sbhushan and Watch844 have little regard for WP:CRYSTAL.
Sbhushan: most of the archeological studies have focused on tracing Indo-Aryans from Central Asia to India during a particular time period. OIT would be about 2000 years earlier in opposite direction, so no work done yet.
Watch844: recent genetic, archeological and linguistic evidence is a step in the right direction of descerining the truth of the matter and freedom from the socio-myth constructs that have plagued this field over the last century.
JFD 05:42, 7 August 2007 (UTC)Watch844: That genetics of 1 year ago has definatively disproven AIT/migration is beyond doubt. This view will only stregthen as more work on it is done. Regardless of what has been discussed before, the very scholars on whom you get your opinions are debating the ramifications of all of this now, and the informed discussion is only just beginning.
Declined. No evidence of a policy violation. Mackensen (talk) 18:48, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
