Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Jagz
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Jagz
| main edit links history watch Filed: 22:48, 14 March 2008 (UTC) |
- Jagz (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- GavinTS (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- JaredTlr (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Code letter: F
- Supporting evidence: [1]
Jagz was blocked for 3RR violation on the Race and intelligence article. GavinTS made his first edits later the same day. He started making accusations of sockpuppetry against the editors who had opposed Jagz.[2] GavinTS was blocked.[3] JaredTlr then appeared. He has reverted the same material as Jagz did in the Race and Intelligence article.[4][5][6] He has also edited Wrenn v. Boy Scouts of America. Just like Jagz also did recently.[7] Ultramarine (talk) 22:48, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Clerk note: it would appear that the code letter provided (F, "circumvention of community-based bans or blocks") is not applicable to the circumstances cited in the above case—the accounts provided are simply blocked on a disruption basis, rather than with the backing of the community through consensus expressed via discussion. However, the question of whether a case warrants a check is the remit of the Checkusers, not the Clerks, and I will make no further comment. AGK § 23:18, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- Well, 3RR via socks is a valid "E". Thatcher 02:43, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- GavinTS and JaredTlr are
Confirmed but they are
Unrelated to Jagz. Thatcher 02:58, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.

