Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/i123Pie

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that was withdrawn by the candidate. Please do not modify it.

[edit] i123Pie

Voice your opinion (talk page) Final (0/4/0) at 00:19, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Withdrawn by candidate. Nick (talk) 00:19, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

i123Pie (talk · contribs) - I have worked hard to get my barnstars, high article edit-count, and I think i worked well. I revert vandalism a lot and I mainly concentrate on IP vandalism, I also help out at MediaWiki: a lot. – i123Pie _bio^contribs 23:25, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Did I mention i was a major IP editor before i got i123Pie (talk · contribs)? – i123Pie _bio^contribs 23:54, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: – i123Pie _bio^contribs 23:32, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?

A: Helping non-admins out on fully protected pages, further vandalism fighting, protecting pages that get vandalised a lot.

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: Best contributions? That sounds a bit bias don't ya think? But it has to be List of mayors of Margate, I am devoted to that article. I plan to get that tag free.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: Well me and another user sort of got in a policy-war, but we soon sorted it out.

[edit] General comments

• See i123Pie's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.

• Links for i123Pie: I123Pie (talk · contribs · deleted · count · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · search an, ani, cn, an3)

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/i123Pie before commenting.

[edit] Discussion

[edit] Support

[edit] Oppose

1. Oppose - Lack of experience. Also, wikipedia isn't about accumulating barnstars or Wikipedia:Editcountitis. Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 23:42, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

   I know that! Do you think im dumb? I did not say it was, all my edits are constructive, and I just thought I might as well mention the barnstars. – i123Pie _bio^contribs 23:57, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

2. Oppose Experience + answers to questions... - Milk's favorite Cookie 23:42, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
3. Strong Oppose per response to Wisdow89 above. An excellent example of why this user is not suited to adminship at this time. I would strongly urge the candidate to withdraw their RfA at this time. Nick (talk) 00:03, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
4. Oppose User should gain some more experience on Wikipedia before reapplying again. Keep up the good work! Stephenchou0722 (talk) 00:10, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.