Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SMcCandlish 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] SMcCandlish

Voice your opinion (talk page) (0/0/0); Scheduled to end 03:15, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

SMcCandlish (talk · contribs) - Ah, SMcCandlish. A guy who I've seen everywhere, doing most everything, and automatically thought he was an admin. I go and look to see if he is, turns out he's not. People who are part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Cue sports of course know who he's is, he's been heavily involved there. He contributes pretty heavily to all spaces, with 30k contribs to his name, including over 10k to the mainspace alone. He helps in a lot of the core policy areas of wikipedia, which I try not to touch myself, such as the Manual of Style. He's done so much on Wikipedia that I haven't seen that it's probably better to let him talk about some of his contributions, the ones I've looked at have really been great though. Wizardman 03:15, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
I will have to put this on hold for an extended period, due to generally being very busy. Te thought is much appreciated, but I don't want to seek adminship until I again have the time to do admin duties on a regular basis. So, unless there is a procedural reason to close this, just keep it dormant. I'll have the time later, probably in 1-3 months after some offline business is resolved. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 08:25, 14 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
A:
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
A:
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A:

[edit] General comments

RfAs for this user:
Requests for adminship/SMcCandlish Requests for adminship/SMcCandlish 2

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/SMcCandlish before commenting.

[edit] Discussion

[edit] Support
  1. Support as nom. So I don't have to worry about it later. Wizardman 04:07, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Oppose

[edit] Neutral