From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Testing new signature. -- Renesis (talk) 16:51, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Testing a signature -- Renesis discussion history 23:42, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Testing signature again -- Renesis discussion history 23:44, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Testing signature again -- Renesis discussion history 23:45, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
June 13, 2008
June 13, 2008
December 6, 2006
November 20, 2006
[edit] Wikipedia talk:High-risk templates
[edit] Full protection of user-warning templates is ridiculous
- High-use does not mean high-risk
- Subst'd templates are not at high-risk of server load
- Subst'd templates are possibly at risk for only 1 or 2 instances of inclusion of vandalism, assuming the editor using it doesn't check the result (which they should have).
- Preventing the risk of a low amount of vandalism does not outweigh the bad in locking out well-meaning vandal-fighting editors from continually improving these templates.
- Just because these templates have been created and are in use, does not mean they are "final". Proposing an edit on the talk page for a grammar fix on a level 0 spam template is NOT an acceptable solution for editing.
- Serious harm has been done to by protecting these templates.
Mountain View , [[|Santa Clara County]] , California
 |
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, unconstructive edits, are considered to be vandalism. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Renesis (talk) 18:32, 11 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
Please do not vandalise Wikipedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Renesis (talk) 18:32, 11 January 2007 (UTC) |
 |
Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked. Renesis (talk) 18:32, 11 January 2007 (UTC) |
