Template talk:Relist
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Creepy! I wrote the exact same thing and put it in my own template, located here. That's scary! :( Mo0[talk] 22:05, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
I suggest using {{relist|~~~~}} or {{subst:relist|~~~~}}. r3m0t talk 22:32, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Changes
I am the obligatory guy who doesn't like the recent changes. Do we really need to lose the color emphasis? I don't see the problem with the coloring being there. --W.marsh 00:43, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
- I don't mind some colour but I too found the red a bit over-emphatic. - brenneman{L} 05:07, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Suggested new layout
I suggest this:
- AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, ~~~~
--Ezeu 20:50, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Well, what else can I do but assume that "silence means consent". --Ezeu 21:07, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] #CC6600 and the line
I'm not too nuts about the color, #REDIRECT #CC6600, though. It looks kind of washed-out to me. A think a darker color, a dark red or blue or green or whatever. But anyway, can we not have a line above the text? It helps to separate the two sections of discussion, does it not? Herostratus 00:37, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Associate this template with a category?
Could this template, like stub templates, automatically list the AFD page in a category to be created, named Category:Relisted articles for deletion. The idea would be to focus attention on relisted AFDs as being more urgent than the other ones. Of course, there is no deadline, but it seems like a decent idea to this uninformed soul. YechielMan 08:06, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- I don't see the point in that. No AFD is any more or less urgent than others. — CharlotteWebb 03:28, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
