Template:Relevance fallacies

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

v • d • e
Fallacies of relevance
General
Absurdity • Accident • Ad nauseam • Argument from ignorance • Argument from silence • Argumentum ad populum • Base rate fallacy • Compound question • Fallacy of many questions • Argument to moderation • Naturalistic fallacy • Proof by assertion • Irrelevant conclusion • Special pleading • Straw man • Style over substance fallacy • Two wrongs make a right
Appeals to emotion
Fear • Flattery • Nature • Novelty • Pity • Ridicule • Repugnance • Spite
Genetic fallacies
Ad hominem (Ad hominem tu quoque) • Appeal to authority • Appeal to motive • Appeal to tradition • Appeal to wealth • Appeal to poverty • Association fallacy • Bulverism • Chronological snobbery • Ipsedixitism • Poisoning the well • Appeal to Etymology • Reductio ad Hitlerum
Appeals to consequences
Appeal to force • Wishful thinking
Categories: Philosophy and thinking navbox templates
Views
  • Template
  • Discussion
  • Current revision
Navigation
  • Main Page
  • Contents
  • Featured content
  • Current events
Interaction
  • About Wikipedia
  • Community portal
  • Recent changes
  • Contact Wikipedia
  • Donate to Wikipedia
  • Help
Powered by MediaWiki
Wikimedia Foundation
  • This page was last modified 21:32, 8 May 2008 by Wikipedia user Dbergan. Based on work by Wikipedia user(s) Paradoxial, RussBot, Richard001, Koweja, Socal gal at heart, Natalie Erin, Jc37, Tombstone, CapitalR, Postmodern Beatnik, Bryan Derksen, Korny O'Near, Coelacan, NickBush24, Koavf and Smurrayinchester and Anonymous user(s) of Wikipedia.
  • All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details.)
    Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a U.S. registered 501(c)(3) tax-deductible nonprofit charity.
  • About Wikipedia
  • Disclaimers