Talk:Reliance Communications
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Needs clean-up and is definetly a stub, probably ripped off the Reliance site.
vc
[edit] good to bad to worse to perhaps better?
As of Oct 31 2005, I edited to remove what I perceived to be essentially an advertisement for Reliance Infocomm. Perhaps the edits on Oct 5 or Sep 23 may provide a better direction for the tone of this article.
A lot of sections that are copied verbatim from news articles are appearing frequently. The story regarding content of Sun TV delivered on Mobiles is just one of such cases. I am removing this section.
[edit] Reliance Infocomm Discussions
Find good unbiased discussions about Reliance Infocomm and their services here: www.RIMweb.in
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.177.147.219 (talk) 12:06, 5 April 2007 (UTC).
59.92.192.223 17:11, 11 May 2007 (UTC) congestion too much in reliance, evrywhere59.92.192.223 17:11, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
is it the way to become the number one telecom. if it acquires the small ones bcz being the #2nd.
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Relcomm.gif
Image:Relcomm.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:19, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

