Religious freedom in the United Kingdom

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article or section is in need of attention from an expert on the subject. Please help recruit one or improve this article yourself. See the talk page for details. Please consider using {{Expert-subject}} to associate this request with a WikiProject

This article does not cite any references or sources. (July 2006) Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unverifiable material may be challenged and removed.

Please help improve this article or section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. (January 2007)

The status of religious freedom in the United Kingdom varies across the constituent countries of the United Kingdom, as the three legal systems (see English law, Scots law and Northern Ireland law) encompass religious freedom in different ways, reflecting the nature of religion in the United Kingdom.

The United Kingdom is not a secular state. The head of state also heads the established church in England, and the status of the Church of Scotland in Scotland is laid down in law.

The United Kingdom is a signatory of the European Convention on Human Rights which provides a right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. Article 9 guarantees "the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief, in worship, teaching, practice and observance" and that "freedom to manifest one's religion or beliefs shall be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of public safety, for the protection of public order, health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others".

Contents 1 Act of Settlement 2 Blasphemy 3 Adoption agencies 4 Education 5 See also 6 Footnotes

[edit] Act of Settlement

The Act of Settlement 1701 decrees that that the monarch of the United Kingdom "shall join in communion with the Church of England". This act was specifically designed to prevent a Catholic monarch from ascending to the throne, but in effect discriminates against all religions other than Anglicanism. Members of the Royal family in line of succession who marry a Roman Catholic (though not adherents of other denominations or faiths) are excluded from the succession.

[edit] Blasphemy

The crime of blasphemy is retained by England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, and their respective governments have repeatedly refused to extend that crime to cover any religion other than Christianity. See Blasphemy law in the United Kingdom.

The last person to be imprisoned for blasphemy in the UK was John William Gott in 1922, for comparing Jesus Christ to a clown. The next blasphemy case was in 1976, when Mary Whitehouse brought a private prosecution (Whitehouse v. Lemon) against the editor of Gay News for blasphemous libel after he published a poem by James Kirkup called The Love That Dares Speak Its Name. Denis Lemon was given a nine month suspended sentence and a £500 fine for publishing the "most scurrilous profanity" which portrayed the sexual love of a Roman centurion for the body of Christ on the cross. The sentence was upheld on appeal.

In this appeal case, Lord Scarman held that the modern law of blasphemy was correctly formulated in Article 214 of Stephen's Digest of the Criminal Law, 9th edition (1950). This states as follows:

Every publication is said to be blasphemous which contains any contemptuous, reviling, scurrilous or ludicrous matter relating to God, Jesus Christ or the Bible, or the formularies of the Church of England as by law established. It is not blasphemous to speak or publish opinions hostile to the Christian religion, or to deny the existence of God, if the publication is couched in decent and temperate language. The test to be applied is as to the manner in which the doctrines are advocated and not to the substance of the doctrines themselves.

In 1996 the European Court of Human Rights (case #19/1995/525/611) upheld a ban on Visions of Ecstasy, an erotic video about a 16th century nun, based on the video infringing on the blasphemy law. The Court estimated that a limited ban on vulgar or obscene publications that would be offensive to believers, while keeping legal the criticism of religion, was compatible with the principles of a democratic society.

[edit] Adoption agencies

The Equality Act^[1] is applied equally to religious-based and secular adoption agencies. The Catholic adoption agencies unsuccessfully attempted to negotiate a compromise that would include an exemption for religious-based agencies, which would have allowed them to continue to facilitate adoption for traditional opposite-sex parents only.

[edit] Education

Several university student associations have implemented rules that require affiliated groups to allow "anybody, regardless of faith, ethnicity or sexuality, to sit on their ruling committees and to address their meetings."^[2] However some Christian Unions say they should be allowed to require that their ruling committees share their beliefs.

[edit] See also

• Antidisestablishmentarianism

[edit] Footnotes

Status of religious freedom around the world  v • d • e
Afghanistan | Algeria | Canada | People's Republic of China | Colombia | France | Georgia | Germany | India | Iran | Italy | Malaysia | Mauritania | Pakistan | Philippines | Saudi Arabia | Sri Lanka | Sudan | United Kingdom | United States