Talk:Reginald Ray

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
WikiProject Buddhism This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. Please participate by editing the article Reginald Ray, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

Socrates This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale.

The Buddhist Saints article within this entry seems outdated as far as the work that Reggie is becoming his legacy. A new article about meditating with the body should be inserted by someone who has done this training extensively. Donalds (talk) 05:50, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Lama?

Is he a Lama? He is in the Lama Category? Billlion 20:42, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

I kinda think it can be removed but its a little unclear. I don't think he uses that term to discribe himself, but he seems to be moving in that direction. Sylvain1972 16:09, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
Students of Chogyam Trungpa don't use the title lama. Instead they use the title Acharya. Davidreid 02:26, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
Yes, this is true, but Acharya Ray recently formed his own organization and seems as if he may be headed toward some kind of break with the Shambhala sangha. He gives pointing out instructions and conducts his own initiations into Vajrayana practice, which Acharyas have not been authorized to do. Sylvain1972 14:29, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Reggie would entertain this question by first asking what value the questioner placed on Tibetan culture versus the teachings of the Dharma. Titles are handed down in a cultural context, sometimes for political reasons and nepotism. He would then very graciously point the questioner in the direction of a lama, wishing him or her well, AND/OR he would invite the questioner to PRACTICE(meditate), which would help the questioner with his or her quest in the first place.67.41.113.220 05:33, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Wonderful. Doesn't help us build an enyclopedia article though. --kingboyk 15:30, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Reggie is not a lama.'Donalds 19:11, 13 April 2007 (UTC)|Donalds}}

A more accurate description would come from Ray's "'Indestructible Truth'" in a Chapter about Tulkus. One could describe Ray as a "direct tulku." Donalds 07:58, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Themes of Dr Ray's Teaching

Perhaps there should be a section on some of the primary themes of Dr. Ray's teaching. Here are a few ideas:

  • importance of the body for modern meditators
  • the Buddhist path of meditation is a way to reconnect with the primordial spirituality characteristic of pre-agricultural, indigenous cultures
  • the highest possible spiritual attainment is to become completely individuated and to engage the world fully

I'm not sure how to organize or present this stuff. Ideas? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.15.185.75 (talk) 17:08, 17 April 2008 (UTC)