Talk:Reginald Hugh Hickling

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Reginald Hugh Hickling has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
	An entry from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on May 12, 2007.
Article milestones Date Process Result May 31, 2007 Good article nominee Listed October 15, 2007 Good article reassessment Kept Current Status: Good article

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Biography     (Rated GA-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. Biography Portal GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] This article is supported by the Science and academia work group. It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality. WikiProject Law (Rated GA-Class) Law Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale. Mid This article has been assessed as Mid-importance on the assessment scale. SGpedians' Resources (Rated GA-Class) Reginald Hugh Hickling is part of SGpedians' Resources An attempt to better coordinate and organise articles related to Singapore. To participate, simply edit this page or visit our noticeboard for more info. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] GA pass

Pass The article is short, but clear, concise, and direct, with adequate citions and good grammar and writing style. Overall it's sufficient for GA, in my opinion. The citation style seems a bit inconsistent, and the article is in need of a picture. These will hold it back from FA status down the road, but are not enough of a problem to hold it back from GA status. Bradford44 19:58, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA Sweeps (kept)

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Ruslik 08:29, 15 October 2007 (UTC)