Talk:Reformed epistemology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. | ||||||||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. | ||||||||
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale. | ||||||||
|
|||||||||
[edit] "Great Pumpkin" Objection
It seems that we need to have some indication of Plantinga and others' responses to the "Great Pumpkin" argument. Gabrielthursday 17:32, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
I agree, especially since the criticism is lifted from a quotation in Plantinga's work itself! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.178.18.185 (talk) 13:05, October 25, 2006 (UTC)
If nobody minds, I'd like to ad some more by way of Plantinga's response tot he Great Pumpkin objection, namely the reply that sure, if the believer in the great pumpkin really does acquire her belief via belief forming structures that are working properly, then they can be properly basic. But this is only a problem for the Reformed Epistemologist if Great Pumpkin belief is true. Beretta NZ 00:50, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Don't you mean false? 1Z 02:07, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Why doesn't this article have Plantinga's responses to DeRose? Doesn't make much sense to not include them. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 159.53.110.141 (talk) 18:12, August 21, 2007 (UTC)
