Talk:Red Hot Catholic Love

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Red Hot Catholic Love is part of WikiProject South Park, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia articles related to South Park. If you wish to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-Importance on the importance scale.

I removed the word 'pissed' in two places. See Wikipedia:Profanity. Even though the South Park episodes use profanity, we shouldn't use them in plot synopsis unless we are directly quoting the show. Phantom784 02:47, August 25, 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Introduction

"In the DVD commentary for this episode, Stone and Parker refer to their irritation towards arguments from more socially liberal/atheistic/secular minded types of people, as well as socially religious conservatives, who are the usual targets for their gags."

Why is this here? I'm not sure why this needs to be on the page, at all, but if so, then it should probably be relegated to a 'DVD Extras' or '6th Season Commentary section.' It doesn't seem relevant for the general outline. 71.127.95.182 09:58, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

It was originally in a trivia section, which needed to be removed, so that was where I moved the text to. Thedarxide 08:04, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] I think it should be redirected.

This episode article is comprised mainly of plot. It should be merged with the main list, and have a few short paragraphs on the plot given. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 02:49, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Ummm are you saying we should not include the plot in the article? :confused: It's a great episode and deserves it's own article like every other episode. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Couldn't think of a decent username (talk • contribs) 09:55, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

I think this is the most ridiculous idea since people wanted to delete the "Cleveland Shootings" because no one got hurt physically. This episode deserves it's own article like every other episode. No one should have to go to the episode list or any other place to find information on this episode. So what, this article is mainly for the plot. Look at chemicals that have their own article. They're not large. You don't need to write a book to describe, "A pencil is what you use to write."--Xxhopingtearsxx (talk) 01:06, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Redirect

I have redirected this episode because it was comprised mainly of plot, and had little to no outside information on the episode. The workers who sculpted the article's efforts were not in vain, though. The episode's contents now exist identically in South Park Wiki. Just so you know. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 07:07, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Phantom Of Liberty

Is similarity to another film really enough to add it in? I don't even see the similarity anyway...there's poop in both scenes, that's it. Lots42 (talk) 17:34, 20 March 2008 (UTC)