Talk:Real Time Gross Settlement
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg
Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 11:33, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Core banking
Can someone please explain what core banking is? 193.95.165.190 10:59, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] RTGS vs Netting
I don't think RTGS is an alternative to netting. You can have netting throughout the day and just one RTGS at the end of the day. Can someone with more experience in banking confirm this? Maszanchi 08:57, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
RTGS is an alternative to netting in as much as RTGS payments are settled irrevocably in real time throughout the day, whereas netting system settlements only happen a few times a day (and value is not transferred until after the settlement of the netted totals has taken place). You're right that most netting systems would effect final settlement of the net totals by means of an RTGS system: but this is essentially different to use of RTGS for settlement of single payments on a real time basis.
RTGS was originally intended for settlement of systemically important payments (i.e. usually for payments with a very high value) while netting systems are intended to deal with payments of a lower value and that are not systemically important. However, in many countries RTGS is the only means of getting same day value, so it also tends to be used for lower value payments that are time-critical (such as house purchase payments). SurreyPanda 16:33, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] RTGS in India
It is strongly suggested that the section on RTGS in India is moved to a separate article. Kacper (talk) 23:50, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
