User talk:Rcknight

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Knight Entertainment

Don't ask me; I'm just carrying out the deletion as per the deletion policy. If you think the deletion was improper, feel free to make your case at Wikipedia:deletion review. But if you do so, it's best to explain why the original deletion was improper, merely rehashing the argument you made many times in the AfD is not going to win you any support. -R. fiend 20:18, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

So R. fiend what is the point of this web site? What good does it do to bring fortha a case when no one will give you an answer? I have asked and asked and made may case, and no one have given me any reason as to why they vote the wway that they did. When someone did make a sugestion I made the adjustments, so I am at a lost for why it move forward?

I feel like this site is a scam and if you are not a regualr ass kisser then your articles do not get posted. I feel like I have just as much reson to have my article posted then other things that are found on this site but no one will explan to my why mine is picked for deletion.--Rcknight 20:44, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

It seems like to me that soneone just piced deleted,and everyone follows with no reason. --Rcknight 20:44, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

It seems your article was viewed as an ad. This is not uncommon when people write articles on their own companies. Basically there are several million companies in the world, most of which will never appear in this or any other encyclopedia. It seems you did not make your case as to why your company is one of the few that merits mention. You are right in one case, I'm sure there are other companies that do have article that probably warant deletion. Feel free to nominate any such ones at WP:AFD, but do not do so just to make a piont. If you honestly feel there are comparable articles that are basically ads, that's one thing, but if you take a "a company got deleted so this should too" approach you will not likely be taken very seriously, you'll just look like a whiner. There you have it. -R. fiend 20:57, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

R. fiend Thanks for your comments. I think this site is great and I would hate to delete other peoples stuff. I am a very progressive positive person. The only time I would refference other peoples articles are to try to support mine. I recently came across articles of flash animations series I am about to do productions for. Then I came across an article for O3 Entertainment which is a small independant video game production company that released the video game Alien Hominid for Newgrounds.com which als o has a site for their character named Pico (Newgrounds.com)which is also on one of my productions. I support all of these efforts and thought that it was neat that they were on your site. I then thought that i would expand upon these by noting on Pico and Newgrounds the production, then I created my article. I do not mind being deleted, but I want to know why with a reason so I then can strive to bring it up to par. I did make changes but I feel that by then everyone was going with the crowd for deletion. Then when you make the final call, you give no opinion, but just tell me you did it because of the votes.--Rcknight 21:05, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

I would like an answer on what would be notable so that I can set that goal and try again. --Rcknight 21:05, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

I would also like to note that the company called The Behemoth has had an article for over a year with just one production that is Newgrounds.com related. Just another observation of just as notable articles that were not makred for deletion when mine was.--Rcknight 21:17, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

First of all, it's not the article that needs to be notable, it's the company. There's nothing you can do to make the company more notable than what you're doing already, I'm sure. If you want to take the article to deletion review, you have some grounds on the fact that it was pretty substantially rewritten after most of the votes were cast. However, I would not be optimistic; your multiple voting and arguing turned off a lot of people who may have been less inclined to vote to delete. Many people will oppose reopening the can of worms. As it stands, I'm not the best person to go to here. I don't know much about the field, and I'm one of the users who gives less latitude towards things that can be viewed as advertizing. Though I do not know him, User:Billpg seemed to be your most sympathetic voice at the deletion discussion, but even he did not vote to keep, even after the rewrite. Your best bet would probably be to look at similar articles that haven't been deleted and contact users who have been involved in those. Check the talk pages too. You might find more sympathetic ears there. In any case, the article would need some work. -R. fiend 21:59, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

I have better use of my time then to try to create a movement of people to agree with me for somethin as trivia as an article on this web site. if the processfails I more then likely will drop it all together and just asume that people who have little else to do with their life then to write articles for this web page got their panties in a wad because someone else is usineg their time for someting more constructive.

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Dementia-CF-Thumb.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dementia-CF-Thumb.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 00:18, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:ManiaLogoMed.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:ManiaLogoMed.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:39, 20 October 2007 (UTC)