Talk:RCA

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Companies Portal
This article is within the scope of Companies WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of companies. If you would like to participate please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
B This article has been rated as b-Class on the assessment scale.
High This article has been rated as high-importance on the assessment scale.
Society Portal
This article is part of WikiProject Media, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to media. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

It says here that RCA was put together by AT&T and United Fruit. Are you sure United Fruit was involved?


Here it says that RCA 'aquired the famous trademark of the dog "Nipper" listening to "His Master's Voice.'

Is this correct? Surely this remained with EMI/HMV - a British company? However, it is possible that they formed an alliance with HMV, and were then permitted to use this trademark within the USA. Can someone please clarify this?

-- David Martland 05:55 15 Jun 2003 (UTC)

The British Company HMV and the USA company Victor were both decended from companies founded by the same Emile Berliner, and they had a relationship, releasing records recorded by each other on the other side of the pond. Victor was a shareholder in Gramophone & Typewriter and then HMV, though I don't know what percent. I think by agreement HMV and Victor split up the rights to use the artwork in different parts of the world. HMV had the rights to the dog & gramophone logo in most of Europe and the Commonwealth (although Canada seems to have been a special case, as Berliner had already established a seperate company there; see Berliner Gramophone). Victor had rights to the logo in the USA, Latin America, and Japan (and possibly a few other non-European countries). While there are still some details I'm not sure of, I hope this helps. -- Infrogmation 07:35 15 Jun 2003 (UTC)

Actually, I belive the Victor company of japan (AKA JVC or Nivico ) held the rights to japan. cmacd123 09:05 20041006
Yes, after JVC split from US RCA Victor. -- Infrogmation 21:04, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Ahem. In World War I, Italy fought AGAINST Germany. It was NOT allied with it. Figured someone should point this out. -Penta 02:04, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Artist List

Any chance we can get a list of artists that are on RCA Records?

[edit] First Television

Didn't "Philo Farnsworth" demonstrate the worlds first TV system (not RCA)? -68.239.224.85

Define "television". RCA showed *something* in 1939, but the Germans had been broadasting in 1935 and John Logie Baird would have argued strenously that *he* was first. Define "first" - a wavery black diagonal line flickering in a darkened laboratory, or a scheduled commerically-supported broadcast with sound? "Firsts" are rarely definitive. Thank heaven Tesla never got interested in pictures by wire else the revert war would never end. --Wtshymanski 17:23, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
What Farnsworth demonstrated would qualify as "television." In 1929, he transmitted an image of his wife over eletronic television. Recognizable image, recorded with a camera, converted to radio waves, received, decoded, and displayed by another, independent piece of hardware = television. However, Farnsworth's system was not the first television. It was the first electronic television. Previous television systems were mechanical, relying on a light bulb and rotating disc. ClarusWorks 17:47, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
The article doesn't claim RCA's 1939 television system was the "first" television. Details about Farnsworth don't belong in the RCA article if he wasn't working for them. I put in a link to History of television where people interested in that subject can go for detail. -- Infrogmation 18:06, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] defunct?

How can RCA be defunct? I still see televisions and other products being manufactured with that brand name attached. I should remove the defunct businesses category from this article. --SuperDude 08:45, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

RCA TVs are made by Thomson SA so RCA exists only as a brand name used by Thomson for consumer electronics and by Sony BMG Music Entertainment for recorded music. Steelbeard1 03:52, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Um, if that's true, then why does the article state this: "Thomson eventually bought the RCA trademarks, subject to the perpetual license GE had issued to Sony BMG's predecessor." 24.7.217.221 02:03, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

It simply means that Thomson bought the RCA trademarks from GE after they bought corporate RCA, subject to the license that BMG got from GE for the same trademark rights. Cherrydude 04:16, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

What I don't get about this situation is that, if Thomson & BMG bought the RCA trademarks, then technically, GE doesn't have the power to license that property, because they no longer own that property. So, in the end, that sentence makes no sense whatsoever. 24.7.217.221 19:41, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Thomson owns the trademarks. BMG uses it under license from Thomson. Steelbeard1 19:51, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
How could Thomson own the trademarks? GE licensed them to Thomson. If you recieve a license from someone for a product, that doesn't mean you own the trademarks. That just means that you're "renting" them for a certain amount of time. 24.7.217.221 23:36, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
See the UK Intellectual Property Office web site at [1] and [2] which show that GE transferred the British registered trademark "RCA" to RCA Trademark Management SA (owned by Thomson) on July 31, 2003. So Thomson owns the RCA trademark, lock, stock and barrel.Steelbeard1 02:01, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] List of RCA records artists

Removed this as it was a fairly short list of artists; some of them of major note, some not so major. If this was to be a complete list, it would bloat out the article far more than its benefit would justify, and if it isn't, what's the point of a list of *some* RCA artists?

What qualifies as an RCA records artist? One signed to RCA? Which RCA? One distributed by RCA? What if they were only distributed by RCA in some countries at some stage (e.g. ABBA)?

Fourohfour 12:21, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] RCA Logos

The block letters RCA logo introduced in 1968 is used by Thomson. The original lighting bolt RCA logo is used by Sony BMG. Steelbeard1 15:52, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

The circular lightning bolt logo is the "original" logo that was replaced by the newer 1968 logo as indicated above...the reverse of what is claimed in the page.

After GE split up RCA, BMG revived the "original" logo. Steelbeard1 19:53, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RCA and RCA Victor infoboxes

I would love to see infoboxes for the RCA Records, RCA Victor and RCA Red Seal labels, but the present layout consolidating all of RCA into one article makes it impractical today. Can the article be split so the recorded music operations can have infoboxes? Steelbeard1 11:51, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

I went ahead and placed the RCA Records infobox in the RCA article. I hope this will hasten the splitting up of the RCA article to make RCA Records a separate article. Steelbeard1 05:30, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Make RCA Records a separate listing again.

With infoboxes being added to active record labels, we desperately need to make RCA Records a separate article instead of redirecting it to RCA. How can it be "unredirected"?

Agreed. We need to split RCA Records from the main RCA article. Steelbeard1 10:44, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

I added a split box in the main article to try and fast forward the spinning off of RCA Records into a separate article. Steelbeard1 03:17, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

The split is complete. RCA Records is now a separate article. Steelbeard1 19:39, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] See Also section

I removed RCA Type 77-DX Microphone, which was listed in the See Also section. (User • Talk) 15:28, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] some old rca memories

the round logo with the lighning bolt was affectionately referred to by employees in the 70's as "the rca meatball."

the tv labs in bloomington, indiana, developed a potential competitor for the beta tape system. it comprized a dual-reel cassette which had a clamshell door which protected the recording media. when inserted into the recorder/player, the door would be pulled open and the record/playback head would slide INTO the cassette, providing about a 120-degree or more wrap of the tape around the revolving head. unlike beta or vhs, virtually the only moving parts of this system were the tape and the reels. this was demonstrated to me in the mid-late 70's by Larry Smith. after the demo, i remarked to Larry that, not only would i buy one of these players immediately when it became available, i'd also buy a tv to use with it! it was that good!

the recording tape of that size and era was not of very high quality yet, and there would be blank spaces of insufficient oxide coating or other imperfections which caused sporadic white bars to blip onto the tv screen during playback. the rca engineers elegantly solved this problem by detecting the white spots and, where they occurred, replacing them, on the fly, with the same scan line from the previous frame! the "on-versus-off" comparison of that circuitry was breathtaking at the time. flip the switch: bars pop up every second or two. turn on the circuit: no white blobs at all! zero.

unfortunately, management at rca decided that it would be impossible to market such a player/recorder for less than a retail price point of about $1000.

ironically, the first beta and vhs machines came out in the $1200 or so range, as i recall. management had killed another potential market winner through ongoing lack of foresight and marketing guts. common, but sad. --24.163.113.113 01:44, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RCA has No 1-800 Number Support

... and that fact is not mentioned in the article. Sodlllop 15:46, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

This is completely irrelevant to the article. Steelbeard1 15:56, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Introduction rewrite

I shortened the (long) introduction by moving the extra information to a 'Present' section. The introduction needs a rewrite because it only deals with the present status of RCA. It does not cover its past history (i.e, why it was a major corporation or past contributions that shaped the era) as well as briefly explain why and when it broke-up. Can someone who is more familiar with the subject rewrite it? Ǣ0ƞS 08:43, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RCA

In Romania, RCA stands for Raspundere Auto Civila, which is a mandatory ensurance for automobiles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.34.163.6 (talk) 08:21, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Needs a total rewrite

This article looks like it could use a total rewrite...the "History of RCA" seems to have a proseline, the lead section needs a total rewrite, and there's a "Trivia" section that still needs to be merged. Agreed? --Jacob Myers 21:59, 8 October 2007 (UTC)