Talk:Ray Bradley
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Leave off the speedy stuff, I've only just started it. Have some patience please William M. Connolley 21:47, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- Putting up your blog buddy, WMC, isn't very respectable .... J. D. Redding 14:44, 5 March 2006 (UTC) (probably should get a VfD; but I know you will call in friend to protect it if it was ...)
Move this to the Hughes bio, "Hughes is one of the world's best known dendrologists". J. D. Redding
THis needs a rewrite ... "It is ironic, that the two senior authors have been disappeared by those who would dispute the results of that paper" J. D. Redding 14:47, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- Please leave the ref format alone: there is an arbcomm judgement on this. VFD? Would be a waste of time, so... William M. Connolley 16:19, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WMC POV
WMC POV editing and reckless opinion removed:
- According to Bradley's point of view (derived from various statistical studies and energy balance models)
- (alluding to his belief that McIntyre and McKitrick's work did not properly go through the peer review system). Some have wondered why Bradley did not archive his data sets for future review.
- References
- ^ Variations of the Earth’s surface temperature
- ^ Letters Requesting Information Regarding Global Warming Studies; Letter to Dr. Raymond S. Bradley, requesting information regarding global warming studies.
- ^ Irene Sege, "Inhospitable climate; Political storm over global warming swirls around a UMass professor". Boston Globe.
- ^ "Interview With Ray Bradley; Interview with Ray Bradley". CNN.com.
- ^ "Bradley’s Data Archiving". climateaudit.org, July 2005.
- External articles
- Climate System Research Center (a site that he is averse to it seems from his editiing pattern)
J. D. Redding 11:16, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Reddi, this is silly. Wiki-ing "Perspective (cognitive)" for "point of view" is just so typically pointless and you. And asserting that it *is* Bradleys POV is silly too: its better to refer to what his actual work says. William M. Connolley 11:59, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
Nothing silly here ... it's better to be NPOV in your editing ... it is Bradley's perspective (derived from certian studies and models) ... which adhere to your own perspective (eg., POV) .... not to mention that he is your "blogging buddy". Also ... information like "Bradley’s Data Archiving" from climateaudit.org should be included ... a site that you seem to be averse to. J. D. Redding 12:05, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

