Talk:Ratification
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ratification is the act of making something valid by confirming it; for example, international threaties are often confirmed by vote from national parliaments or other national institutions.
(-> I suggest that the text about the project of a constitution for the European Union is moved to another article, probably about European Union)
Contents |
[edit] What is this article talking about?
This article is extremely ambiguous - it talks about "the Convention and its resulting constitution", "the text", and "the treaty", without giving any indication of what might be meant.
I suppose this is intended to be part of another article?
It certainly doesn't seem to talk about ratification in general.
-- pne 17:09, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- It was a part of European constitution, in a section that is now removed [1]. Right now, it's effectively orphan, since none of pages pointing here is about European constitution. Incorporate into some article about EU? Or just delete? Andris 20:35, Apr 9, 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Ratification of the European Constitution
I've updated this section now to take account of the fact that the European Constitution wasn't ratified. It needs to be watched, though, just in case the constitution is revived. Daduzi 22:43, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
i still don't get what
[edit] ratify
A ratifuing; formal confirmation.
there is ratifcation european constitution but not one on the u.s. history constiution!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.3.14.2 (talk) 00:04, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Lets talk about.......... George Read!
Why did he ratify the constitution? i don't really know from the article written.
It's a pretty poor example.
lets talk about the ratificaton of the constitution!!! this information doesn't really talk about it!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.3.14.2 (talk) 00:02, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WP:Law
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a quality rating on the assessment scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance assessment on the assessment scale. | |
Bearian 00:20, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] ratification, acceptance, approval, and accession
The UN seems to differentiate between ratification, acceptance, approval, and accession; yet it treats them all as ratification. Could someone please add a section explaining the difference between these? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.15.164.116 (talk) 03:13, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] so we think??
What does the -so we think- mean on this sentence in the article? The application of the treaty or legislation is not possible until it has been ratified, so we think. In addition to the suggestion above, I note in a UN document the term succession which could also be explained as well as ratification and accession. Ray3055 (talk) 19:41, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
rhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhffffffffffffffffjjjjjjjjjjjjjekdifehyufrehfuyqerfgerwuyfgequfyrhferuf this is dumb —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.171.110.252 (talk) 20:05, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Read the following report from page 47: it explains all these terms, as used by the UN. http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/FactSheet30en.pdf —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.78.45.5 (talk) 11:20, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
