Talk:Randal O'Toole
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Economist?
I am not sure if O'Toole can be called anything but a polemicist. Referring to this author as an economist confuses O'Tooles polemical writings with academic empirical research. Besides, if you look at http://www.urbanfutures.org/otoole.html, you can see that O'Toole was trained in forest management and geology. The graduate work he supposedly undertook in economics in the 1970s doesn't make him an economist--not by training and certainly not by accomplishment. --Kim--~~—Preceding unsigned comment added by Kimwell (talk • contribs) 03:07, August 14, 2006
[edit] Not an Economist
O'Toole does not hold a graduate degree in economics. Holding a BS in Forest Management might pass the Cato Institute's sniff test for an economist, but it would not get him hired on an economics faculty at a reputable university. 24.21.99.110 21:05, 28 July 2007 (UTC)Brian
- Perhaps passing the sniff test at a "reputable" university would not get someone hired at the Cato Institute, either. Academic and government institutions tend to be either Keynesian or Monetarist, while Cato tends to be more Austrian or Libertarian. That difference in fundamental philosophy makes it less likely that an adherent of one would take an adherent of the other seriously. For example, I sometimes want to put the word "economist" in quotes when I talk about academics or people running the Fed or Treasury. (I see their success as coming from the use of force [taxes, etc.] rather than from having the best ideas.) This is the counterpart to your not wanting to call someone an economist unless they've gone through the academic filter. SkyDot 17:12, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

