From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I figured since I've been here over a year I should update my user page. The userboxes describe about 60 percent of who I am, but it is a good starting point.
My most inspiring, and tiring, work at Wikipedia has been in the JFK articles. I'd like to thank Oliver Stone for getting me interested in the subject. However, I have been disappointed that most of his most damning evidence in the film, is quickly shown to be false or misleading upon a very cursory review of the actual evidence. That being said, I do thank him for sparking my interest in this exciting topic. Here at Wiki, trying to balance the subject, as well as fend off vandals has kept me busy. I also enjoy working on the professional wrestling, hip hop, and political articles (been accused of being both a supporter and hater of the American right- which means I must be doing something right) here at Wiki. They´re less stressful than Kennedy, but just as satisfying.
Please direct comments to me here. Unless I'm asked to do otherwise, I'll respond on my talk page.
Ramsquire 20:26, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 |
According to the Political Compass this user is:
Economic Right (2.00) and
Social Neutral (-0.77) |
 |
This user reserves the right to completely screw up his or her edits. |
 |
This user prefers using userboxes to fill up his/her user page instead of actually writing something useful. |
| ubx-5 |
This user uses entirely too many userboxes. |
 |
This user is a fan of The Rated-R Superstar Edge. |
| STAR WARS |
This user is a true Star Wars fan, and as one, considers the films to be a single work. |
SW
V |
This user thinks The Empire Strikes Back was the best chapter of the Star Wars saga . |
| DarkSide |
This user wishes you knew the power of the Dark Side. |
SW
VI |
This user thinks Return of the Jedi was the worst chapter of the Star Wars saga. |
[edit] Barnstars
 |
|
The Original Barnstar |
| I award Ramsquire a barnstar for adhering to a NPOV policy, for staying on topic and being civil in discussion, and for being a kind, valuable contributor to wikipedia. --Ubiq 08:20, 13 February 2007 (UTC) |
 |
|
The Barnstar of High Culture |
| For your tireless efforts navigating through explosive religious, cultural and historical subjects, making sensible compromises and staying cool while doing that. ←Humus sapiens ну? 04:33, 15 February 2007 (UTC) |
GREATEST HITS
Looking over your "contributions" and your discussions not only on this article but on several others, I can see that you're a committed conservative idealogue, doing whatever you can to protect and enhance the reputations of famous conservative idealogues, while trying to make it look like you're "only following wiki policy" ("...only following orders" can't be far off for folks like you). I personally find that reprehensible, and won't spend any more energy fighting you over the trivialities of your hero Bill.--Info999 02:53, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- OTOH- There's this edit summary by Arzel. -- Ramsquire, don't POV push.
This web site isn't for the thin-skinned types and "editors" must learn that it is improper to delete properly cited information because of personal beliefs...In answer to the person above (Ramsquire), there is no "personal attack" on you or anyone else, only a critical review of the editing skills being exhibited. Remember the story of "the princess and the pea?" That princess should not try to be an editor. Her feelings might get "hurt." RPJ 23:54, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
