User talk:Rahulr7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Heather Mills McCartney

How do you think these papers got into the public domain? Who do you think leaked them and why? Wikipedia is not a place for gossip. Of course her allegtions are not NPOV. If they are in legal papers before the family court they should not be discussed outside those proceedings. If they are subject of discussion, they should not be. The only relevant point is that it is acknowledged by both that the marriage has irretrievably broken down. "to at least mention" is a split infinitive. - Kittybrewster 15:28, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

It doesnot matter as to why (or who put )these papers are in the public domain. The fact remains that these papers are in the public domain, and are subject to much intense discussion. Wikipedia maynot be a place for gossip, but it certainly is not a place for investigative facts either. What it is known for, is its' unbiased "reporting" of events. Certainly, when more and more people look to Wikipedia as a source of reliable information, it is atleast necessary (whether split infinitive or not) to report what is happening. There is a subtle difference in "reporting" and opinionating, and i am afraid, you are not able to see it. Anyway, since u are one of the supposed "gods" of wikipedia, i leave the final decision to your consciousness. rahul regula 09:37, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Rahul: see #6 here. -- weirdoactor ^t|c -- 21:10, 9 November 2006 (UTC)