Talk:Ragıp Zarakolu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ragıp Zarakolu article.

Article policies
WikiProject Turkey This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Turkey, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Turkey-related topics. Please visit the the participants page if you would like to get involved. Happy editing!
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
edit · history · watch · refresh To-do list for Ragıp Zarakolu:

No to-do list assigned; you can help us in improving the articles in the same category

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Science and academia work group.
Maintenance An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.
It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Turkey may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool (FIST) may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Contents

[edit] Comments

[edit] Biography assessment rating comment

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- -- Thesocialistesq/M.lesocialiste 21:50, 4 July 2007 (UTC)


[edit] POV/Biased

The article suggests that the subject person have been wrongfully convicted and sentenced by The Republic of Turkey. As there is no information that this person was trialed or ruled out to be innocent by judicial bodies other than Turkish courts or that the Turkish courts re-ruled the cases against him in his favor, the statements in the article reflect the authors point of views on the judicial outcomes rather than the facts. Please consider resentencing or tagging with POV or biased tag. DeliDumrul 01:48, 22 June 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Copyright

Major part of the article is directly copied from the website given as an external source. No appropriate citation is made. No information was found on the subject site about the copyrights on the information presented there. DeliDumrul 01:58, 22 June 2006 (UTC)


There is plenty of source. Including this: http://www.ifex.org/en/content/view/full/70650. If you are worried about copyright, reword it (and I dont' mean change "Arm Gen" to "Arm Massacre"), don't delete wholesale sections.--TigranTheGreat 03:34, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Do we copy paste information from other web sites and expect somebody will evantually realize this and reword it? How does this help keep WP GNUFDL? DeliDumrul 04:05, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Reword it. Don't delete large sections wholesale.--TigranTheGreat 23:02, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Umm.. Why am I rewording it? Who dumps such big chunks should take care of it. If nobody cares to properly reword it, it's destiny is to be deleted. This is true for every article. DeliDumrul 05:07, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Not really. Wiki guidelines demand to try to reword segments instead of deleting them. I suggest you read the guidelines.--TigranTheGreat 22:33, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

I guess I couldn't explain myself. If you (or anybody else) wants to reword it, that's fine with me. But it's not gonna sit here forever. DeliDumrul 06:07, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tags

References and POV check tag since this is a living person Bio and everything in there needs to be referenced and checked for POV. Baristarim 20:18, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Version

would someone be willing to check the different versions and could Mardavich (or someone else) tell me why the old version found to possibly be biased and badly sourced was re-installed? Sc.helm 15:49, 16 February 2007 (UTC)