User talk:Radak

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It is my honor to award, you, Radak, the Exceptional newcomer award for your enthusiasm in your contributions since your arrival. Banes 08:35, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
It is my honor to award, you, Radak, the Exceptional newcomer award for your enthusiasm in your contributions since your arrival. Banes 08:35, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

Greetings. I've blocked you for 1 week for the personal attacks on your user page, and for reverting Justin Berry. I normally give warnings for this sort of thing, but I think it's clear that you knew what you were doing, and it's not acceptable. You may email me to discuss this if you so choose. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 04:26, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Let's be honest here. You've blocked me because I am amongst the growing crowd who are questioning the motives of those amongst the Wikipedia staff and administration when it comes to blocking accurate, npov, thoroughly-sourced information in the Justin Berry article. Do you even know why, are you just playing lemming like the rest of them? Radak 04:28, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
I blocked you because you're throwing gasoline onto a fire and your personal attacks were completely unacceptable. If you have a problem with the way an situation is handled, discuss. If you must resort to posting childish attacks on your user page, you're not welcome here. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 04:34, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Discussion is a two-way street. Where's the Wikipedia editor/staff contribution to the discussion on the Justin Berry talk page? Why are all the questions from my side of the argument being ignored? Why has no one yet managed to justify the removal of any of the thoroughly-documented information from the Justin Berry page? I'm not trying to throw gasoline onto a fire here. I don't have an agenda, and I'm honestly not particularly interested in Mr. Berry or his sordid history. What I am interested in is seeing Wikipedia be a respected and accurate source of free information for those who seek it, and when the Wikipedia staff themselves engage in an organised effort to remove accurate information with no justification whatsoever (we normally call this vandalism), Wikipedia's credibility goes out the window. Justify yourselves and maybe we'll start to listen. My side has justified itself repeatedly. It's your turn now. Radak 04:45, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
(...at which point I am predictably ignored and stonewalled, which seems to be the Wikipedia staff's official response to any direct questioning on the Justin Berry issue. One might think they've hired Scott McClellan to handle their PR. Clearly they are aware of the untenability of their position, and they're really hoping it will just go away. Sorry guys, it won't.)

[edit] Justin Berry

…There is currently an ongoing discussion on Talk:Justin Berry regarding the inclusion of certain content in the article. I'm adding this note here because you have previously expressed an interest in the article.… --Ssbohio 01:36, 25 August 2007 (UTC)