Talk:Radziejów

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Poland Portal Radziejów is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Poland on Wikipedia. To participate simply edit the article or see our current projects and discussions. On the main project page we have some tools to help you out. Don't hesitate to ask questions!
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

	It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in Poland may be able to help!
	The Free Image Search Tool (FIST) may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

The Google Video posted as reference had no sound, so I removed the link to it, and the material that was referenced with it. Balcer 13:23, 21 May 2007 (UTC) My bad, the sound works, it was a problem on my end. Balcer 15:40, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

The entry was extremely biased. In fact, this wiki was edited by someone who runs a website (http://www.polandinjustice.com/) that obviously has a personal vendetta, therefore i removed the anti-Polonist statements. In fact, the previous editor even links to this entry from his website which proves an obvious bias. Do we really need to know that a father & his son from a nearby village were treated poorly by Poles? No, we don't. How does it relate to the history of this town? It doesn't therefore I removed it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.1.11.19 (talk) 01:12, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Once again someone is finding it necessary to add content that adds absolutely NOTHING to the history of the town of Radziejow. It is heresay first of all. Second, the person adding this has a personal bias as the source of his information is his OWN FATHER. The author hosts a website that links to this article, therefore I see many biases in these additions and prefer to keep them out. Not to mention they border on anti-Polonism, of which the author is guilty as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.152.10.41 (talk) 22:18, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Whoever keeps reverting the page is not giving reasons and has not even answered WHY they should be kept. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.152.10.41 (talk) 15:05, 29 February 2008 (UTC)