Talk:Radio button
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Example HTML code
Here is HTML code for an example. It cannot be rendered here. You can copy it to an HTML file and view the result with your browser.
<table border="1">
<tr>
<td colspan="4">Select Business Rule Definition for Agency + CBR Combination below:</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2"><input type="radio" checked="checked" name="pp" value="CBR" id="pp"/>Agency + CBR </td>
<td colspan="2"><input type="radio" name="pp" id="pp" value="PENDING"/>Agency + CBR PENDING </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td > Agency Code/Name </td>
<td> </td>
<td>Agency Code/Name </td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CBR Number </td>
<td> </td>
<td>CBR </td>
<td>PENDING </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>OA Number </td>
<td> </td>
<td>Committed Pending Group </td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
</table>
[edit] Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was no move. Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 14:57, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Radio button → Option button Discuss— Option button is a more modern term to refer to this widget —208.138.31.76 21:36, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
- Oppose radio button is more common. 132.205.93.33 01:39, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose 1,170,000 ghits for "radio button" [1], 919,000 for "option button" [2] – Anþony talk 04:53, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Radio button is surely more common. Option button is much less descriptive/specific to the topic of the article. -- AuburnPilottalk 07:33, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose I have a fair background in GUI design and I seldom hear the term "option button." MeekMark 13:00, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose It's definitely a "radio button", and I'd be surprised if all of Anþony's hits for "option button" referred to radio buttons anyway. FiggyBee 00:02, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
Add any additional comments
-
- Moved from uncontested. Vegaswikian 01:18, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not sure this is a wise move without some discussion. This button is commonly know as radio button so why change? Vegaswikian 01:18, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit] Deleting the "See also" section
No idea what this section is about or what it is doing there. I think it could just be deleted. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.9.47.220 (talk) 13:36, 13 February 2007 (UTC).
- Agreed, I've removed it. -- Bovineone 07:29, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Paragraph about HTML is *wrong*
An interesting aspect of radio buttons, when used in an HTML form, is that if no button in a group is checked, then no name-value pair is passed when the form is submitted.
WRONG! W3C specs say user agents (browsers) should check the first element if none is marked checked; and that because not all user agents do that, authors should check a default element anyway.
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Radiobuttons.png
Image:Radiobuttons.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:52, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Reqphoto
We need a photo of a car radio, preferably an old one with physical pushbuttons. We should also get some screenshots to show what they usually look like and so readers will say "oh, those". —Ben FrantzDale (talk) 12:13, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Agreed. Piccy would be worth a thousand words. (Ever try describing an ampersand (&) to someone well enough for them to draw it?) Myles325a (talk) 00:14, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] This radio button does not operate a radio
Techies forget that a lot of people who use Wikipedia aren't. What with internet radio these days, would you blame some Serbian grandmother in Wisconsin for thinking that this is how she might once again hum to the sweet folk songs of her youth? Alas, this 'radio button' will not take her back to the green fields of home. So I have added a sentence close to start of article to disenchant anyone with similar misconceptions. I DO wish editors, especially techies, would adopt my dictum of writing as if that Serbian grandmother in Wisconsin was representative of their audience. Myles325a (talk) 00:37, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Etymology
Any idea where the name "radio button" comes from? --24.82.156.18 (talk) 16:36, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
This seems to be included now. Earthlyreason (talk) 10:36, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

