Talk:Rachel Plummer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is part of WikiProject Texas, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Texas.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
This article is part of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, which collaborates on Native American, First Nations, Inuit, Métis and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.

This article has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it needs.

A fact from Rachel Plummer appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 6 September 2007.
Wikipedia


Not much, but a start. I'll work on it as time permits, or of course, feel free to help. (Texan Traveler 04:26, 12 June 2006 (UTC))

[edit] Wrong Fort Parker

The link to Fort Parker points to an entirely different Fort Parker, an Army fort in Montana. --Davecampbell 19:45, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Restoring conclusion

I restored the conclusion which had been edited out of the article. The fact a pregnant 17 year old girl was able to survive for 2 years among the fierce Comanches remains an amazing feat. Her book is a timeless look inside a culture long destroyed, and the end section is a vital part of the article. John1951 23:37, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

I am going to remove the section again. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, [a memorial], and we should be trying to present the text in a formal format. The articles should also be written in neutral point of view, and this conclusionary paragraph is meant to have a point-of-view. The facts should instead be presented in a concise format without editorializing. Encyclopedia articles should also not have a conclusion. Is there any information missing in the rest of the article that is in the conclusion that you feel should be included? Karanacs 01:23, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi Karanacs - I disagree with you on this, but will defer to your more experienced judgment. I felt that the article benefited from the final section, which emphasized the truly amazing feat of survival by a pregnant 17 year old girl. That is not POV, since the sources cited agreed. I don't think it is editorializing when it quotes respected historians. But again, I am not trying to have an edit war with you. I would rather work with you on improving this article, and others. John1951 12:34, 4 November 2007 (UTC)