Talk:Rabbit's foot

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The first sentence is both hilarious and indecipherable: "Among the mysteries of magical lore, budding adepts learn that a rabbit's foot is the foot of a rabbit." ... unlike other people who think a rabbit's foot is the foot of an elephant, say.

Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make whatever changes you feel are needed. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. You don't even need to log in! (Although there are some reasons why you might like to…) The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. -- Elonka 05:58, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Went ahead and removed the first sentence per your suggestion. Wikipedia brown 00:14, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
"Fourth, according to still more sources, not just any left hind foot of a rabbit shot in a cemetery during a full moon on Friday the 13th will do; the marksman must also be cross-eyed. Although one must consider that any rabbit that is killed in a cemetery on Friday the 13th during a full moon by a cross-eyed marksman must be possibly the unluckiest rabbit of all time." Is this true? It seems to be written in a very unencyclopedic manner. 210.86.123.120 10:46, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
I removed the editorializing from that particular paragraph. - Smerdis of Tlön 18:50, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
It doesn't matter, that whole section is crap. It is written as a story and every entry doesn't just build on the previous, it tells the same stupid story over and over.

[edit] Also European tradition?

I recall hearing that at one time in Europe, a foot was left on skinned rabbits for sale, so that the buyer could be sure he was not getting a cat. Both animals look similar when skinned if the heads are missing. I don't have any source for this other than oral folklore, so I'm not adding it to the article yet, but I thought it should be mentioned here. Rooster613 14:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC)