Talk:Quileute (tribe)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Language/People Split
I really think this article should be split into Quileute people or just Quileute (for the people) and Quileute language. It seems too confusing for there to be a single article for them both. Of course, it is a stub, so maybe that explains it. --TheSlyFox 12:06, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- Agree.·Maunus· ·ƛ· 06:50, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Also agree, and ideally a further one for their government. Similar needed splits are common in Native American/First Nation articles; I've made quite a few of them, i.e the splits; mostly just making two stubs nd let 'em grow from there....some growk, some don't, but it helps sort out the categories a lot....Chemakum also, as it happens, needs a similar split (they're Quileute's cousins and adoptees).Skookum1 (talk) 04:08, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- PS evolved format should be Quileute for the people, Quileute language for the language; only if there's a situation like Okanagan people is the +people needed; or in some cases where there's a big disambig potential where the single-word becomes the dsismbig page, e.g. Squamish. Anyway g'nite.Skookum1 (talk) 04:12, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- Also agree, and ideally a further one for their government. Similar needed splits are common in Native American/First Nation articles; I've made quite a few of them, i.e the splits; mostly just making two stubs nd let 'em grow from there....some growk, some don't, but it helps sort out the categories a lot....Chemakum also, as it happens, needs a similar split (they're Quileute's cousins and adoptees).Skookum1 (talk) 04:08, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- Agree.·Maunus· ·ƛ· 06:50, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Agree. Munci (talk) 17:53, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

