User:Quek157/Rfa Test
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page was not meant for any official wikipedia policy or any form of power when it is coming to the WP:RFA test. Other users may have their own tests and this was not meant for a exhaustive list.
Contents |
[edit] Usage of the test criteria
Any editors could use the page data for their own test or any means except for those prescribed by the laws of the editor country.
[edit] Explanation of the grading system
Level 1-Weak Support-The editor could be one whom does have potential to be a good administrator after slight work and I am sure that he/she would be a good admin after some time.
Level 2-Support-He/she is a admin that wikipedia need and his/her potential would be great.
Level 3-Strong support-The admin would be a jewel for wikipedia and it is a great editor.
An editor whom passed the criteria on a particular level would then proceed to the next level and the level of support would be indicated in my support in the RfA nomination.
[edit] Levels
Level 1
- Had at least 500 edits with at least 400 mainspace edits.
- Had at least 130% of edit summary usage. (It was the addition of minor or major edits)
- Note: In the case of a user had less than 30 minor edits, it would be based on 65% of major edits.
- Participated actively in AfD discussions.
- Helped to bring pages he/she to quality.
- Note: At least 1 article to GA/A class or 5 articles to B class.
- Was involved in at least one project
Any other criteria that are applicable indicated in notes.
Level 2
- Had at least 1000 edits with at least 800 mainspace edits.
- Had at least 150% of edit summary usage. (It was the addition of minor or major edits)
- Note: In the case of a user had less than 30 minor edits, it would be based on 75% of major edits.
- Participated actively in AfD discussions.
- Helped to bring pages he/she to quality.
- Note: At least 1 article to FA class or 5 article to GA/A class or 15 articles to B class.
- Was involved in at least three project
Any other criteria that are applicable indicated in notes.
Level 3
- Had at least 2000 edits with at least 1500 mainspace edits.
- Had at least 180% of edit summary usage. (It was the addition of minor or major edits)
- Note: In the case of a user had less than 30 minor edits, it would be based on 95% of major edits.
- Participated actively in AfD discussions.
- Helped to bring pages he/she to quality.
- Note: At least 5 article to FA class or 15 article to GA/A class or 25 articles to B class.
- Was involved in at least six projects
Any other criteria that are applicable indicated in notes.
[edit] Additional requirements
The user could be able to answer the 5 optional questions with a degree of standard to be considered for the test.
[edit] Failure of test
If any candidates whom fails the criteria in level one would be placed in these category.
Neutral-Fails 2 criteria in level 1 or unable to answer the questions posted.
Oppose-Fails the test in level 1 more than 2 points.
[edit] Disclaimer
This test was not meant to defame the candidates running from RfA and not all candidates would be assessed due to time shortage
[edit] Changes in this test
This is version 1.1 of the test, please do not modify it. Disputes in content should be brought up to my talk page. Older versions(currently none) would be archived in a different page and it would be indicated in the discussion statement.
