Talk:quattro GmbH

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Cars Portal This article is within the scope of Wikipedia Project Automobiles, a collective approach to creating a comprehensive guide to the world of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you are encouraged to visit the project page, where you can contribute to the discussion.
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-Class on the Project's quality scale.
???	This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the importance scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Quattro GmbH article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	It is requested that a photograph or photographs of logo be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in Germany may be able to help!
	The Free Image Search Tool (FIST) may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

[edit] Wording

This needs some reworking sentences like:"RS owners need make no sacrifice for everyday comfort, luxury and practicality" are like advertimsnet style... --— Typ932^{T | C}  10:08, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

The tone is no different to that found on BMW M (it has similar wording). I really don't think it is any more of an "advert" compared to any of the thousands of other Wikipedia "commercial product" articles. I think your concerns (the bit you quoted above) are notable for this article, because many "high performance" cars generally compromise on either two or three of the attributes (comfort, luxury, practicality), and some sports cars, such as say the Lotus Elise do completely without all three! Kind regards -- Teutonic_Tamer (talk to Teutonic_Tamer) 14:01, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Quite many BMW articles are really bad... those arent great examples. For example see articles like Maserati MC12 or other selected ones. Every car has compromises in one area or other. --— Typ932^{T | C}  14:49, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Hmmm . . . I agree the MC12 is a very good article, however, I notice it has a few references from questionable sources! -- Teutonic_Tamer (talk to Teutonic_Tamer) 15:40, 7 June 2008 (UTC)